SCS-C02 Exam Dumps - Amazon Web Services AWS Certified Specialty Questions and Answers

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Using AWS WAF with an Application Load Balancer (ALB) allows you to mitigate SQL injection attacks quickly by deploying managed rule groups designed for common web exploits. This method allows the existing EC2 instances to continue operating without changes, minimizing disruption.

By fronting the EC2 instances with an ALB, you can then:

Apply WAF rules

Redirect DNS records from Route 53 to the ALB

Restrict direct EC2 access via security groups

This approach is rapid, low effort, and preserves availability, making it ideal for critical, time-sensitive security mitigations.

The correct answer is B. Modify the network ACL that is associated with the CIDR range to allow outbound traffic to ephemeral ports.

This answer is correct because network ACLs are stateless, which means that they do not automatically allow return traffic for inbound connections. Therefore, the network ACL that is associated with the CIDR range of the new application must have outbound rules that allow traffic to ephemeral ports, which are the temporary ports used by the vendors’ machines to communicate with the application servers.Ephemeral ports are typically in the range of 1024-655351. If the network ACL does not have such rules, the vendors will not be able to connect to the application.

The other options are incorrect because:

A. Modifying the security group that is associated with the EC2 instances to have the same outbound rules as inbound rules is not a solution, because security groups are stateful, which means that they automatically allow return traffic for inbound connections.Therefore, there is no need to add outbound rules to the security group for the vendors to access the application2.

C. Modifying the inbound rules on the internet gateway to allow the required ports is not a solution, because internet gateways do not have inbound or outbound rules. Internet gateways are VPC components that enable communication between instances in a VPC and the internet.They do not filter traffic based on ports or protocols3.

D. Modifying the network ACL that is associated with the CIDR range to have the same outbound rules as inbound rules is not a solution, because it does not address the issue of ephemeral ports.The outbound rules of the network ACL must matchthe ephemeral port range of the vendors’ machines, not necessarily the inbound rules of the network ACL4.

The correct answer is D. Import a new third-party certificate into AWS Certificate Manager (ACM). Associate the certificate with the ALB. Install the certificate on the EC2 instances.

This answer is correct because it meets the requirements of complete encryption of the traffic between external users and the application. By importing a third-party certificate into ACM, the security engineer can use it to secure the communication between the ALB and the clients. By installing the same certificate on the EC2 instances, the security engineer can also secure the communication between the ALB and the instances.This way, both the front-end and back-end connections are encrypted withSSL/TLS1.

The other options are incorrect because:

A.Creating a new Amazon-issued certificate in AWS Secrets Manager is not a solution, because AWS Secrets Manager is not a service for issuing certificates, but for storing and managing secrets such as database credentials and API keys2. AWS Secrets Manager does not integrate with ALB or EC2 for certificate deployment.

B.Creating a new Amazon-issued certificate in AWS Certificate Manager (ACM) and exporting it from ACM is not a solution, because ACM does not allow exporting Amazon-issued certificates3.ACM only allows exporting private certificates that are issued by an AWS Private Certificate Authority (CA)4.

C.Importing a new third-party certificate into AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) is not a solution, because IAM is not a service for managingcertificates, but for controlling access to AWS resources5. IAM does not integrate with ALB or EC2 for certificate deployment.

The correct answer is B. Instruct users to run the aws sts get-session-token CLI command and pass the multi-factor authentication --serial-number and --token-code parameters. Use these resulting values to make API/CLI calls.

According to the AWS documentation1, the aws sts get-session-token CLI command returns a set of temporary credentials for an AWS account or IAM user. The credentials consist of an access key ID, a secret access key, and a security token. These credentials are valid for the specified duration only. The session duration for IAM users can be between 15 minutes and 36 hours, with a default of 12 hours.

You can use the --serial-number and --token-code parameters to provide the MFA device serial number and the MFA code from the device. The MFA device must be associated with the user who is making the get-session-token call. If you do not provide these parameters when your IAM user or role has a policy that requires MFA, you will receive an Access Denied error.

The temporary security credentials that are returned by the get-session-token command can then be used to make subsequent API or CLI calls that require MFA authentication. You can use environment variables or a profile in your AWS CLI configuration file to specify the temporary credentials.

Therefore, this solution will resolve the problem of users being unable to perform EC2 commands using the AWS CLI, while still enforcing MFA.

The other options are incorrect because:

A. Changing the value of aws:MultiFactorAuthPresent to true will not work, because this is a condition key that is evaluated by AWS when a request is made. You cannot set this value manually in your policy or request. You must provide valid MFA information to AWS for this condition key to be true.

C. Implementing federated API/CLI access using SAML 2.0 may work, but it requires more operational effort than using the get-session-token command. You would need to configure a SAML identity provider and trust relationship with AWS, and use a custom SAML client to request temporary credentials from AWS STS. This solution may also introduce additional security risks if the identity provider is compromised.

D. Creating a role and enforcing MFA in the role trust policy may work, but it also requires more operational effort than using the get-session-token command. You would need to create a role for each user or group that needs to perform EC2 commands, and specify a trust policy that requires MFA. You would also need to grant the users permission to assume the role, and instruct them to use the sts assume-role command instead of the get-session-token command.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

Amazon Inspector is an automated vulnerability management service that continuously scans Amazon EC2 instances for software vulnerabilities and unintended network exposure. It uses a combination of the EC2 instance’s metadata and installed packages to detect CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures).

AWS Systems Manager Patch Manager automates the process of patching managed instances with both security-related and other types of updates. Together, these services provide detection and remediation capabilities, fulfilling both the detection and mitigation requirements.

This approach is directly aligned with AWS Security Specialty best practices for Infrastructure Security.

Enable VPC Flow Logs:

VPC flow logs capture details about the network traffic in your VPC, including both accepted and rejected traffic.

Configure the flow logs to capture traffic for the subnet where the affected EC2 instances are located.

Filter Rejected Traffic:

In the flow log configuration, ensure that you capture rejected traffic (log-status = REJECT).

This will provide a record of instances that attempted to communicate on TCP port 2905 and were blocked by the NACL rule.

Analyze Flow Logs:

Search the flow log records for entries where:

destination-port = 2905

log-status = REJECT

This will help identify the specific EC2 instances attempting to communicate on TCP port 2905.

Advantages of Using VPC Flow Logs:

Cost-effective: No additional infrastructure or services are required.

Scalable: Automatically captures traffic across the subnet without manual intervention.

Detailed Logs: Provides granular details about the rejected traffic.

VPC Flow Logs Documentation

Filtering VPC Flow Logs

 these are the strategies that can reduce the attack surface and enhance the security of the containers. Containers are a method of packaging and running applications in isolated environments. Using containers to automate security deployments can help ensure that security patches and updates are applied consistently and quickly across the container fleet. Segregating containers by host, function, and data classification can help limit the impact of a compromise and enforce the principle of least privilege. The other options are either irrelevant or risky for securing containers.

To address the issue of an Amazon EC2 instance receiving suspicious requests over an open TCP port, the most effective solution is to update the Network Access Control List (NACL) associated with the subnet where the EC2 instance resides. By adding a deny rule for the specific TCP port and source IP addresses involved in the suspicious activity, the security team can effectively block unwanted traffic at the subnet level. NACLs act as a stateless firewall for controlling traffic in and out of subnets, allowing for broad-based traffic filtering. This measure ensures that only legitimate traffic can reach the EC2 instance, thereby enhancing security without affecting the application's availability to other users. It's a more granular and immediate way to block specific traffic compared to modifying security group rules, which are stateful and apply at the instance level.

The correct answer is C. Configure Route 53 Resolver query logging on all relevant VPCs. Send the logs to Amazon CloudWatch Logs. Use CloudWatch Insights to run queries on the source IP address and DNS name.

According to the AWS documentation1, Route 53 Resolver query logging lets you log the DNS queries that Route 53 Resolver handles for your VPCs. You can send the logs to CloudWatch Logs, Amazon S3, or Kinesis Data Firehose. The logs include information such as the following:

The AWS Region where the VPC was created

The ID of the VPC that the query originated from

The IP address of the instance that the query originated from

The instance ID of the resource that the query originated from

The date and time that the query was first made

The DNS name requested (such as prod.example.com)

The DNS record type (such as A or AAAA)

The DNS response code, such as NoError or ServFail

The DNS response data, such as the IP address that is returned in response to the DNS query

You can use CloudWatch Insights to run queries on your log data and analyze the results using graphs and statistics2. You can filter and aggregate the log data based on any field, and use operators and functions to perform calculations and transformations. For example, you can use CloudWatch Insights to find out how many queries were made for a specific domain name, or which instances made the most queries.

Therefore, this solution meets the requirements of logging and querying DNS traffic that goes to the on-premises DNS servers, showing details of the source IP address of the instance from which the query originated, and the DNS name that was requested in Route 53 Resolver.

The other options are incorrect because:

A.Using VPC Traffic Mirroring would not capture the DNS queries that go to the on-premises DNS servers, because Traffic Mirroring only copies network traffic from an elastic network interface of an EC2 instance to a target for analysis3.Traffic Mirroring does not include traffic that goes through a Route 53 Resolver outbound endpoint, which is used to forward queries to on-premises DNS servers4.Therefore, this solution would not meet the requirements.

B.Configuring VPC flow logs on all relevant VPCs would not capture the DNS name that was requested in Route 53 Resolver, because flow logs only record information about the IP traffic going to and from network interfaces in a VPC5. Flow logs do not include any information about the content or payload of a packet, such as a DNS query or response.Therefore, this solution would not meet the requirements.

D.Modifying the Route 53 Resolver rules on the authoritative domains that forward to the on-premises DNS servers would not enable logging of DNS queries, because Resolver rules only specify how to forward queries for specified domain names to your network6. Resolver rules do not have any logging functionality by themselves.Therefore, this solution would not meet the requirements.

these are the solutions that can securely rotate the secrets for the production RDS database using Secrets Manager. Secrets Manager is a service that helps you manage secrets such as database credentials, API keys, and passwords. You can use Secrets Manager to rotate secrets automatically by using a Lambda function that runs on a schedule. The Lambda function needs to have access to both the RDS instance and the Secrets Manager service. Option B places the RDS instance in a private subnet and the Lambda function in the same VPC in another private subnet. The private subnet with the Lambda function needs to use a NAT gateway to access Secrets Manager over the internet. Option E places the RDS instance and the Lambda function in the same private subnet and configures a Secrets Manager interface endpoint, which is a private connection between the VPC and Secrets Manager. The other options are either insecure or incorrect for rotating secrets using Secrets Manager.