FCP_FAZ_AN-7.6 Exam Dumps - Fortinet Certified Professional Security Operations Questions and Answers

When an incident in FortiAnalyzer is identified as a false positive and its status is updated to "Closed: False Positive," certain records and logs are updated to reflect this change.

Option A - The Audit History Log Will Be Updated:

FortiAnalyzer maintains an audit history log that records changes to incidents, including updates to their status. When an incident status is marked as "Closed: False Positive," this action is logged in the audit history to ensure traceability of changes. This log provides accountability and a record of how incidents have been handled over time.

Conclusion:Correct.

Option B - The Corresponding Event Will Be Marked as Mitigated:

Changing an incident to "Closed: False Positive" does not affect the status of the original event itself. Marking an incident as a false positive signifies that it does not represent a real threat, but it does not imply that the event has been mitigated.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Option C - The Incident Will Be Deleted:

Marking an incident as "Closed: False Positive" does not delete the incident from FortiAnalyzer. Instead, it updates the status to reflect that it is not a real threat, allowing for historical analysis and preventing similar false positives in the future. Deletion would typically only occur manually or by a different administrative action.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Option D - The Incident Number Will Be Changed:

The incident number is a unique identifier and does not change when thestatus of the incident is updated. This identifier remains constant throughout the incident's lifecycle for tracking and reference purposes.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Conclusion:

Correct Answer:A. The audit history log will be updated.

This is the most accurate answer, as the update to "Closed: False Positive" is recorded in FortiAnalyzer’s audit history log for accountability and tracking purposes.

The objective is to create a filter that identifies all login attempts to the FortiAnalyzer web interface (GUI) coming fromLaptop1(IP 10.1.1.100) and excludes the admin user. This filter should match any user other than admin.

Filter Components Analysis:

Operation-login: This portion of the filter will target login actions specifically, which is correct for filtering login attempts.

performed_on==’’GUI(10.1.1.100)’: This indicates that the login attempt must occur on the GUI interface and originate from the specified IP, which matches Laptop1's IP address (10.1.1.100). This ensures that the filter only matches GUI logins from this specific device.

user!=admin: This part excludes logins by the admin user, meeting the requirement to capture only non-admin users.

Option Analysis:

Option A: Correctly specifies theOperation-login,performed_on==’’GUI(10.1.1.100)’, anduser!=admin. This setup effectively filters login attempts to the GUI from Laptop1, excluding the admin user.

Option B: Uses the incorrect IP 10.1.1.120 in the performed_on filter, which does not match Laptop1's IP (10.1.1.100).

Option C: This option includessrcip==10.1.1.100anddstip==10.1.1.210but incorrectly specifiesuser==admininstead ofuser!=admin, which does not match the requirement to exclude admin users.

Option D: This option does not specify theperformed_onfield to restrict it to the GUI and only includesdstip(destination IP) withoutsrcip. It also incorrectly uses user!-admin instead of the correct syntaxuser!=admin.

Conclusion:

Correct Answer:A. Operation-login and performed_on==’’GUI(10.1.1.100)’ and user!=admin

This filter precisely captures the required conditions: login attempts from Laptop1 to the GUI interface by any user except admin.

In a FortiAnalyzer Fabric, devices canparticipate in a cluster or grouping if they meet specific compatibility criteria. Based on the outputs provided, let’s evaluate these criteria:

Version Compatibility:

All three devices, FortiAnalyzer1, FortiAnalyzer2, and FortiAnalyzer3, are runningversion v7.4.1-build0238, which is the same across the board. This version alignment is crucial because FortiAnalyzer Fabric requires that devices run compatible firmware versions for seamless communication and management.

Platform Type and Configuration:

All three devices are configured asStandalonein the HA mode, which allows them to operate independently but does not restrict their participation in a FortiAnalyzer Fabric. Each device is also on theFAZVM64-KVMplatform type, ensuring hardware compatibility.

Global Settings:

Key settings such as adm-mode, adm-status, and adom-mode are consistent across all devices (adm-mode: normal, adm-status: enable, adom-mode: normal), which aligns with requirements for fabric integration and role assignment flexibility.

Each device also has thelog-forward-cache-sizeset, which is relevant for forwarding logs within a fabric environment.

Based on the above analysis,all devices(FortiAnalyzer1, FortiAnalyzer2, and FortiAnalyzer3) meet the requirements to be part of a FortiAnalyzer Fabric.

When a generated report does not contain the expected information even though the logs are confirmed to be present, it typically indicates anissue with the report's configuration. There are a few common reasons this might happen:

Option A - Check the Time Frame Covered by the Report:

Reports are generated based on a specific time frame. If the report’s time frame does not cover the period when the relevant logs were collected, those logs won’t appear in the report output. Verifying and adjusting the time frame is essential to ensure the report includes all relevant data.

Conclusion:Correct.

Option B - Disable Auto-Cache:

Auto-cache is designed to improve report generation speed by using cached data. Disabling auto-cache would typically only be relevant if the report is pulling outdated data from cache, but it doesn’t directly affect whether specific logs are included in a report.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Option C - Increase the Report Utilization Quota:

The report utilization quota is related to the resource limits for generating reports. It does not directly influence whether certain data appears in a report. Increasing this quota would help only if there are resource issues preventing the report from completing, not if specific logs are missing from the report.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Option D - Test the Dataset:

Datasets determine which logs and data fields are pulled into the report. If a dataset is configured incorrectly or does not include the required log fields, it could lead to missing information. Testing the dataset allows you to verify that it’s correctly configured and pulling the expected data.

Conclusion:Correct.

Conclusion:

Correct Answer:A. Check the time frame covered by the reportandD. Test the dataset.

These steps directly address the issues that could lead to missing information in a report when logs are available but not displayed.

To viewCompromised Hostson FortiAnalyzer, certain configurations need to be in place on both FortiGate and FortiAnalyzer. Compromised Host data on FortiAnalyzer relies on log information from FortiGate to analyze threats and compromised activities effectively. Here’s why the selected answers are correct:

Option A: Enable device detection on the FortiGate devices that are sending logs to FortiAnalyzer

Enabling device detection on FortiGate allows it to recognize and log devices within the network, sending critical information about hosts that could be compromised. This is essential because FortiAnalyzer relies on these logs to determine which hosts may be at risk based on suspicious activities observed by FortiGate. This setting enables FortiGate to provide device-level insights, which FortiAnalyzer uses to populate the Compromised Hosts view.

Option B: Enable web filtering in firewall policies on FortiGate devices, and make sure these logs are sent to FortiAnalyzer

Web filtering is crucial in identifying potentially compromised hosts since it logs any access to malicious sites or blocked categories. FortiAnalyzer uses these web filter logs to detect suspicious or malicious web activity, which can indicate compromised hosts. By ensuring that FortiGate sends these web filtering logs to FortiAnalyzer, the administrator enables FortiAnalyzer to analyze and identify hosts engaging in risky behavior.

Let’s review the otheroptions for clarity:

Option C: Make sure all endpoints are reachable by FortiAnalyzer

This is incorrect. FortiAnalyzer does not need direct access to all endpoints. Instead, it collects data indirectly from FortiGate logs. FortiGate devices are theones that interact with endpoints and then forward relevant logs to FortiAnalyzer for analysis.

Option D: Subscribe FortiAnalyzer to FortiGuard to keep its local threat database up to date

Although subscribing to FortiGuard helps keep threat intelligence updated, it is not a requirement specifically to view compromised hosts. FortiAnalyzer primarily uses logs from FortiGate (such as web filtering and device detection) to detect compromised hosts.

FortiAnalyzer offers several features for monitoring, alerting, and incident management, each serving different purposes. Let's examine each option to determine which one best supports a proactive security approach.

Option A - FortiView Monitor:

FortiView is a visualization tool that provides real-time and historical insights into network traffic, threats, and logs. While it gives visibility into network activity, it is generally more reactive than proactive, as it relies on existing log data and incidents.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Option B - Outbreak Alert Services:

Outbreak Alert Services in FortiAnalyzer notify administrators of emerging threats and outbreaks based on FortiGuard intelligence. This is beneficial for awareness of potential threats but does not offer a hands-on, investigative approach. It’s more of a notification service rather than an active, proactive investigation tool.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Option C - Incidents Dashboard:

The Incidents Dashboard provides a summary of incidents and current security statuses within the network. While it assists with ongoing incident response, it is used to manage and track existing incidents rather than proactively identifying new threats.

Conclusion:Incorrect.

Option D - Threat Hunting:

Threat Hunting in FortiAnalyzer enables security analysts to actively search for hidden threats or malicious activities within the network by leveraging historical data, analytics, and intelligence. This is a proactive approach as it allows analysts to seek out threats before they escalate into incidents.

Conclusion:Correct.

Conclusion:

Correct Answer:D. Threat hunting

Threat hunting is the most proactive feature among the options, as it involves actively searching for threatswithin the network rather than reacting to already detected incidents.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract of knowledge of FortiAnalyzer 7.6 Study guide documents:

FortiAnalyzer event handlers support alerting when a rule match generates an event. The study guide states that, for an event handler,“You can select a notification profile to send alerts whenever an event is generated by the handler.”In FortiAnalyzer, notification profiles are the mechanism used to deliver alerts outward (for example, via an SNMP trap), which directly aligns with optionA.

In addition, FortiAnalyzer supports sending notifications to external platforms through integrations:“You can configure FortiAnalyzer to send a notification to external platforms using preconfigured Fabric connectors.”This validates the use ofFabric connectorsas a notification delivery method, aligning with optionC.

OptionBis not a notification delivery method for event-handler-generated alerts in the workflow described (FortiGuard is used for threat intelligence/enrichment rather than relaying alerts). OptionDis not presented in the study guide’s described notification mechanisms for event-handler alerting in the referenced sections.