ISO-IEC-27001-Foundation Exam Dumps - APMG-International ISO/IEC 27001 Questions and Answers

Clause 4.1 specifies exactly what must be determined when establishing context: “The organization shall determine external and internal issues that are relevant to its purpose and that affect its ability to achieve the intended outcome(s) of its information security management system.” This requirement is about understanding internal and external issues (e.g., culture, capabilities, regulatory environment) that influence the ISMS’s effectiveness. Objectives (option B) are addressed later in Clause 6.2; processes (option C) are addressed in Clause 4.4 and operational planning; and “which clauses apply” (option D) is not a determination step—ISO/IEC 27001’s requirements in Clauses 4–10 are not optional. Therefore, the direct, required factor per 4.1 is determining internal (and external) issues relevant to the organization’s purpose and ISMS outcomes.

Clause 7.2 (Competence) requires the organization to:

“determine the necessary competence of person(s) doing work under its control that affects its information security performance;”

“ensure that these persons are competent on the basis of appropriate education, training, or experience;”

“retain appropriate documented information as evidence of competence.”

This makesholding up-to-date records on training, skills, experience, and qualifications(D) the correct answer. Option A is irrelevant to competence. Option B is incorrect since ISO does not require Foundation-level training — competence is context-based. Option C is related to compliance but does not ensure individual competence.

Thus, the verified correct answer isD.

Clause 9.1 requires:

“The organization shall evaluate the information security performance and the effectiveness of the information security management system.”

This is the central purpose of monitoring, measurement, analysis, and evaluation. Competence (B) is covered under Clause 7.2. Monitoring use of assets (C) and outsourced processes (D) may be done, but they are not the formal purpose described in the standard. Instead, performance evaluation ensures the ISMS continues to meet intended outcomes and supports continual improvement.

Thus, the verified purpose is A: To evaluate information security performance.

Certification audits are carried out byCertification Bodies (CBs), not the organization itself. ISO/IEC 27001 requires external certification audits to be independent, impartial, and objective. According to ISO/IEC 27006 (Requirements for bodies providing audit and certification of ISMS), the Certification Body determines theaudit duration and number of audit daysbased on factors such as organizational size, complexity, scope, and risk environment. This ensures consistency across organizations and prevents manipulation by the auditee. ISO/IEC 27001 Clause 9.2 and 9.3 addressinternal audit and management review, but the determination of certification audit days is outside the organization’s control; it rests solely with the accredited Certification Body auditors. Thus,Answer: Bis correct, as the CB’s external auditor formally calculates and assigns the audit time.

ISO/IEC 27001 Clause 9.2 requires internal audits to be conducted at planned intervals, but it does not specify an annual frequency. Certification audits, under ISO/IEC 17021 rules, typically occur on a 3-year cycle with annual surveillance, not strictly “annually.” This makes statement 1 inaccurate.

Audit types are defined in ISO/IEC 19011:

First-party audits: conducted internally by or on behalf of the organization (internal audits).

Third-party audits: conducted by independent external certification bodies.

Thus, statement 2 is correct. Therefore, the accurate choice is B: Only 2 is true.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract ISO/IEC 27000 standards:

ISO/IEC 27000 defines:

Risk analysis: “process to comprehend the nature of risk and to determine the level of risk” (Clause 3.58).

Risk assessment: the overall process of risk identification, risk analysis, and risk evaluation.

Risk evaluation: compares results of risk analysis against risk criteria to determine priority.

Risk management: coordinated activities to direct and control an organization with regard to risk.

Therefore, the missing word in the given definition is“analysis”.

This is important for ISMS implementation: organizations must understand the distinctions. Risk analysis is the core technical evaluation stage, while assessment is the broader process including evaluation, and management refers to the overall governance of risks.

Thus, the correct verified answer isB: Analysis.

Clause 6.1.3 (e) specifies:

“The organization shall obtain risk owners’ approval of the information security risk treatment plan and acceptance of the residual information security risks.”

This confirms that residual risks — those remaining after risk treatment — must be reviewed and formally accepted by the designated risk owner. Option A is incorrect; awareness training is not a default control for all residual risks. Option B misrepresents leadership responsibility; top management ensures processes exist, butrisk ownersformally approve residual risk. Option D (avoiding risk) is a treatment option, not the mandated requirement for residual risks.

Thus, the required response isC: Review and acceptance by the risk owner.

Clause 7.5 (Documented Information) specifies that organizations must maintain documentationnecessary for the effectiveness of the ISMS. Additionally, Clause 9.3 (Management Review) requires “records of decisions related to continual improvement opportunities” as an output of management review. This is a core requirement and forms part of the documented information that must be retained and controlled. Third-party materials (B), budgets (C), and cross-reference statements to other ISO standards (D) are not required by ISO/IEC 27001. Only documents that directly demonstrate compliance, decision-making, and continual improvement are mandated. Therefore, the verified minimum required documentation includesrecords of management review decisionsrelated to continual improvement, confirmingAnswer: A.

Clause 8.1 (Operational planning and control) requires organizations to:

“Ensure that changes are controlled. The organization shall review the consequences of unintended changes, taking action to mitigate any adverse effects, as necessary.”

This requirement ensures that operational processes are planned, controlled, and adjusted where unexpected changes occur. Risk assessments (B) are covered in Clause 6.1.2 (Planning), not operations. Scheduling second-party audits (C) is not an ISMS requirement but part of supplier/customer arrangements. Documenting objectives (D) belongs to Clause 6.2 (Planning).

Thus, the required operational planning and control activity is A: Review the consequences of unintended changes.

ISO/IEC 27013 provides specific guidance on theintegration of ISO/IEC 27001 (Information Security Management) and ISO/IEC 20000-1 (IT Service Management). It offers practical advice for organizations seeking a unified management system approach. While ISO/IEC 27003 (A) provides guidance on ISMS implementation, it does not address integration. ISO 9001 (C) is the Quality Management Standard and can be integrated, but the specific standard designed forintegrating 27001 with ITSMis ISO/IEC 27013.

Therefore, the correct answer isB: ISO/IEC 27013, as it is explicitly published for this purpose.