LLQP Exam Dumps - IFSE Institute Life License Qualification Program Questions and Answers

Joseph’s diamond necklace collection is classified as aninvestment assetdue to its value and potential for appreciation over time. Investment assets are non-liquid assets that hold value, often with the potential to increase, and are usually part of an estate for wealth preservation or transfer. Liquid assets are easily convertible to cash, which does not apply here. Fixed assets typically refer to property or equipment used for business purposes. Thus,Option Baccurately describes the nature of his jewelry collection​​.

When Larissa passes away, her RRSP will be fully taxable on her final income tax return, as it is considered income in the year of death unless rolled over to a qualified beneficiary, such as a spouse. Her TFSA, on the other hand, is not taxable upon death as it passes tax-free to the beneficiary or estate. The principal residence (condo) and cottage may incur capital gains tax, but they are not fully taxable as income.Therefore,Option D, the RRSP, is correct​.

When considering surrendering a universal life (UL) policy, it is essential to understand the tax implications and any costs associated with surrender. Theadjusted cost basis (ACB)helps determine the taxable portion of the policy’s cash surrender value (CSV) because any amount received above the ACB may be subject to tax. Additionally,surrender chargescould reduce the CSV received upon surrender. Therefore, Ljubomir needs to collect both the ACB and any surrender charges applicable to Tanja's policy. These factors will help Tanja make an informed decision regarding the net amount she would receive from surrendering the policy and the potential tax liability​​​.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Alec faces a lapsed policy due to communication failures involving his advisor and firm. The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) regulates Quebec’s financial advisors and firms under the Distribution Act (Sections 103–115), handling complaints about advisor negligence or firm unresponsiveness. Option C is correct, as the AMF can investigate Olivier’s firm’s failure to update Alec’s address or respond. Option A (CLHIA) is an industry group without regulatory power. Option B (Chambre de la sécurité financière) oversees advisor ethics but focuses on individual conduct, not firm-wide issues or insurer disputes. Option D (Assuris) protects policyholders if an insurer fails, not for lapses due to non-payment. The Ethics manual stresses advisors’ duty to maintain client communication, supporting AMF jurisdiction here.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: The CSF Code of Ethics (Section 11) prohibits advisors from denigrating competitors, requiring professionalism in client interactions. Alexandre can’t disparage the FinCode advisor despite the public disciplinary record. Option C—emphasizing his unique approach—focuses on his strengths, encouraging business ethically without criticism. Option A (check CSF records) indirectly highlights the competitor’s fault, risking denigration. Option B (departure dispute) introduces irrelevant negativity. Option D (past experience) could lead to prohibited criticism. The Ethics manual promotes positive differentiation over competitor critique, making C the compliant choice.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Canada’s Anti-Spam Legislation (CASL) governs unsolicited electronic communications, including emails for commercial purposes (Sections 6–8). Contrary to option A, CASL does not prohibit all email solicitation; it allows it withprior consent (express or implied) or under specific exemptions (e.g., existing business relationships). Juliette has no prior relationship with the prospect, and Pierre’s referral does not constitute implied consent under CASL, as consent must come from the recipient (Section 10). Option B is correct because Juliette must obtain the prospect’s consent before sending an unsolicited email, aligning with CASL’s opt-in requirement. Option C is incorrect, as Pierre has no legal obligation to facilitate the contact, though it might be courteous. Option D is impractical and not required by law. The Ethics and Professional Practice manual reinforces that advisors must respect privacy laws and obtain consent before initiating contact, making Juliette’s proposed action non-compliant without prior approval.

As per LLQP guidelines and privacy regulations in Canada, an insurance agent like Vasu is required to submit all medical and lifestyle-related information to the insurer as part of the application process. Additionally, the agent is permitted to retain a copy of this information in his client file for record-keeping and future reference purposes. It is essential for compliance and potential follow-ups related to policy servicing or claims. Privacy laws do not permit Vasu to share this information with unauthorized parties, such as his supervisor or the client, beyond what is required for processing the application, unless consent has been explicitly provided​​.

=================

As Paulette is injured during work and is covered by her employer’s group disability plan, her disability benefits would be paid out under this group insurance policy. Group disability insurance provides both short- and long-term coverage, as outlined in her employer’s benefits plan. This plan typically covers income replacement for non-workplace injuries or illnesses. However, since this was an on-the-job accident, it may be covered by the CNESST, but group insurance often still serves as the primary provider in situations where a workplace injury results in short-term disability exceeding standard workplace injury benefits. The SAAQ would only cover injuries directly related to road accidents within its jurisdiction. Employment insurance (EI) provides general income replacement but is secondary to employer-provided group disability benefits​​.

=================

Under Quebec’s "separation as to property" regime, each spouse retains ownership of their assets unless joint ownership exists. However, the family patrimony typically mandates the division of certain assets, regardless of marital property regimes, unless waived by mutual consent. As they waived the family patrimony, they are exempt from dividing family assets. However, jointly-owned assets such as the cottage acquired together would require division. Isaac's dental practice and life insurance policy are personal assets and not subject to division as they fall outside jointly-owned property​​.

=================

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Ethical misconduct for insurance representatives is governed by the Distribution Act (Sections 16–18) and the Chambre de la sécurité financière (CSF) Code of Ethics. Option B—depositing client funds into a personal business account—violates the requirement to use a separate trust account for client premiums (Distribution Act, Section 52), constituting misappropriation and breaching fiduciary duty. Option A (business card) is permissible marketing. Option C (reimbursement for training costs) is acceptable if disclosed and reasonable. Option D (low-value pen) aligns with CSF rules on minor gifts. The Ethics and Professional Practice manual prohibits commingling client funds with personal accounts, making B the clear misconduct.