LLQP Exam Dumps - IFSE Institute Life License Qualification Program Questions and Answers

With a75% maturity guarantee, Yamina is guaranteed to receive at least75% of the original investmentat maturity, regardless of market performance.

75% × $2,500 =$1,875, but because there is aresetpossibility if applicable and a100% death benefit guarantee, and if there had been any resets (not mentioned here), she would get the original amount$2,500based on the basic guarantee.

Exact Extract:

"At maturity, if the market value is less than the guaranteed amount (typically 75% or 100% of the deposited amount), the maturity guarantee is paid."

(Reference:Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED, Chapter 2.1.1 Guarantees【33:4†Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED.pdf**)

Given Pierre’sshort life expectancy, aterm annuity(paying for a specific period) would ensure he receivesguaranteed payments for a fixed number of years, aligning with his situation and providing steady cash flow.

Exact Extract:

"A term annuity pays a fixed income for a set number of years. It is appropriate for clients expecting a limited lifespan and wishing to maximize payouts during their lifetime."

(Reference:Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED, Chapter 3.2.3 Duration of the Annuity【49:2†Segfunds-E313-2020-12-7ED.pdf**)

A spousal RRSP is beneficial for couples with differing income levels as it allows for income splitting during retirement. This is advantageous because it enables the higher-income spouse to contribute to the RRSP of the lower-income spouse. When the funds are eventually withdrawn during retirement, they are taxed at the lower-income spouse’s rate, potentially reducing the couple’s overall tax burden. This aligns with the LLQP guideline on income splitting as a tax minimization strategy​.

Option B is incorrect because the contributions to a spousal RRSP reduce the contribution room of the contributing spouse, not the recipient. Option C is technically accurate but does not directly address the primary advantage of a spousal RRSP in terms of tax planning, and Option Dis correct regarding extending tax benefits but does not directly highlight the immediate benefit of income splitting for the couple.

When a beneficiary predeceases the policyholder and no alternate or contingent beneficiary has been named, the portion allocated to the deceased beneficiary is typically redistributed among the surviving beneficiaries. Since Michelle was named as a revocable beneficiary andpredeceased Danny, her one-third share will be divided equally between the remaining two beneficiaries, Donna-Joe and Stephanie​.

Thus, Donna-Joe and Stephanie will each receive half of the total death benefit ($500,000 each), as per LLQP guidelines which state that a predeceased beneficiary’s share is typically redistributed among surviving beneficiaries unless otherwise specified​​.

==============

Comprehensive and Detailed in Depth Explanation with Exact Extract from Documents andGuides:

TheIFSE Ethics and Professional Practice Course (Common Law)states that only licensed agents can receive compensation for insurance referrals, and payments contingent on sales are prohibited for unlicensed individuals. Jamie is no longer an agent, and the flat fee is contingent on sales, violating regulatory rules. Her past licensure (A) doesn’t permit this, client awareness (B) doesn’t override the licensing requirement, and the flat fee structure (D) isn’t the issue—contingency is. This protects against unlicensed solicitation, making C correct.

In Ontario, married members of a defined benefit pension plan (DBPP) are typically required to provide at least a 50% survivor benefit to their spouse upon their death unless the spouse waives this right. LLQP materials covering pension plans indicate that this spousal protection is standardfor defined benefit plans, and Maria's pension would provide at least 50% to Juan as the surviving spouse​​.

Options like reducing the survivor benefit below 50% are generally not permitted under Ontario pension law, and a waiver must be in place for any changes​.

Disability insurance policies generally include a grace period of at least 30 days from the premium due date, during which the policyholder can make a late payment without losing coverage. This grace period ensures that minor payment delays do not immediately result in policy cancellation​. Therefore, Melissa’s policy would remain active and would only be subject to cancellation if she fails to pay within 30 days of the missed premium deadline.

Notices of termination are issued only after the grace period has lapsed, giving the policyholder additional time to remedy any missed payments​.

Life insurance agents are generally required to deliver the insurance contract to the client within a “reasonable time” to ensure that the client is promptly informed of the policy’s terms andconditions. This standard is set to prevent undue delays that might affect the client's rights and their free look period. While no specific timeframe is always mandated, it is commonly understood within the LLQP guidelines that timely delivery is essential for compliance​​. Therefore, Olivier can reasonably wait until after his weekend to deliver the contract on Tuesday, as this would still fall within a reasonable time.