SAA-C03 Exam Dumps - Amazon Web Services AWS Certified Associate Questions and Answers

To use AWS Budgets to create and manage budgets for different AWS accounts, the company needs to do the following steps:

Use AWS Budgets to create a budget for each AWS account that needs a different budget amount. The budget can be based on cost or usage metrics, and can have different time periods, filters, and thresholds. The company can set the budget amount under the Billing dashboards of the required AWS accounts1.

Create an IAM role for AWS Budgets to run budget actions with the required permissions. A budget action is a response that AWS Budgets initiates when a budget exceeds a specified threshold. The IAM role allows AWS Budgets to perform actions on behalf of the company, such as applying an IAM policy or a service control policy (SCP) to restrict the provisioning of additional resources2.

Add an alert to notify the company when each account meets its budget threshold. The alert can be sent via email or Amazon SNS. The company can also add a budget action that selects the IAM role created and the appropriate SCP to prevent provisioning of additional resources. An SCP is a type of policy that can be applied to an AWS account or an organizational unit (OU) within AWS Organizations. An SCP can limit the actions that users and roles can perform in the account or OU3.

This option is the most secure and simple way to encrypt the secrets that are stored in Amazon EKS. AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) is a service that allows you to create and manage encryption keys that can be used to encrypt your data. Amazon EKS KMS secrets encryption is a feature that enables you to use a KMS key to encrypt the secrets that are stored in the Kubernetes etcd key-value store. This provides an additional layer of protection for your sensitive data, such as passwords, tokens, and keys. You can create a new KMS key or use an existing one, and then enable the Amazon EKS KMS secrets encryption on the Amazon EKS cluster. You can also use IAM policies to control who can access or use the KMS key.

Option A is not correct because using AWS Secrets Manager to manage, rotate, and store all secrets in Amazon EKS is not necessary or efficient. AWS Secrets Manager is a service that helps you securely store, retrieve, and rotate your secrets, such as database credentials, API keys, and passwords. You can use it to manage secrets that are used by your applications or servicesoutside of Amazon EKS, but it is not designed to encrypt the secrets that are stored in the Kubernetes etcd key-value store. Moreover, using AWS Secrets Manager would incur additional costs and complexity, and it would not leverage the native Kubernetes secrets management capabilities.

Option C is not correct because using the Amazon EBS Container Storage Interface (CSI) driver as an add-on does not encrypt the secrets that are stored in Amazon EKS. The Amazon EBS CSI driver is a plugin that allows you to use Amazon EBS volumes as persistent storage for your Kubernetes pods. It is useful for providing durable and scalable storage for your applications, but it does not affect the encryption of the secrets that are stored in the Kubernetes etcd key-value store. Moreover, using the Amazon EBS CSI driver would require additional configuration and resources, and it would not provide the same level of security as using a KMS key.

Option D is not correct because creating a new AWS KMS key with the alias aws/ebs and enabling default Amazon EBS volume encryption for the account does not encrypt the secrets that are stored in Amazon EKS. The alias aws/ebs is a reserved alias that is used by AWS to create a default KMS key for your account. This key is used to encrypt the Amazon EBS volumes that are created in your account, unless you specify a different KMS key. Enabling default Amazon EBS volume encryption for the account is a setting that ensures that all new Amazon EBS volumes are encrypted by default. However, these features do not affect the encryption of the secrets that are stored in the Kubernetes etcd key-value store. Moreover, using the default KMS key or the default encryption setting would not provide the same level of control and security as using a custom KMS key and enabling the Amazon EKS KMS secrets encryption feature. References:

Encrypting secrets used in Amazon EKS

What Is AWS Key Management Service?

What Is AWS Secrets Manager?

Amazon EBS CSI driver

Encryption at rest

This option is the best solution because it allows the company to migrate the container application to AWS with minimal changes and leverage a managed service to run the Kubernetes cluster and the message queue. By using Amazon EKS, the company can run the container application on a fully managed Kubernetes control plane that is compatible with the existingKubernetes tools and plugins. Amazon EKS handles the provisioning, scaling, patching, and security of the Kubernetes cluster, reducing the operational overhead and complexity. By using Amazon MQ, the company can use a fully managed message broker service that supports AMQP and other popular messaging protocols. Amazon MQ handles the administration, maintenance, and scaling of the message broker, ensuring high availability, durability, and security of the messages.

A. Migrate the container application to Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Use Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) to retrieve the messages. This option is not optimal because it requires the company to change the container orchestration platform from Kubernetes to ECS, which can introduce additional complexity and risk. Moreover, it requires the company to change the messaging protocol from AMQP to SQS, which can also affect the application logic and performance. Amazon ECS and Amazon SQS are both fully managed services that simplify the deployment and management of containers and messages, but they may not be compatible with the existing application architecture and requirements.

C. Use highly available Amazon EC2 instances to run the application Use Amazon MQ to retrieve the messages. This option is not ideal because it requires the company to manage the EC2 instances that host the container application. The company would need to provision, configure, scale, patch, and monitor the EC2 instances, which can increase the operational overhead and infrastructure costs. Moreover, the company would need to install and maintain the Kubernetes software on the EC2 instances, which can also add complexity and risk. Amazon MQ is a fully managed message broker service that supports AMQP and other popular messaging protocols, but it cannot compensate for the lack of a managed Kubernetes service.

D. Use AWS Lambda functions to run the application Use Amazon Simple Queue Service (Amazon SQS) to retrieve the messages. This option is not feasible because AWS Lambda does not support running container applications directly. Lambda functions are executed in a sandboxed environment that is isolated from other functions and resources. To run container applications on Lambda, the company would need to use a custom runtime or a wrapper library that emulates the container API, which can introduce additional complexity and overhead. Moreover, Lambda functions have limitations in terms of available CPU, memory, and runtime, which may not suit the application needs. Amazon SQS is a fully managed message queue service that supports asynchronous communication, but it does not support AMQP or other messaging protocols.

Amazon EFS is a fully managed, elastic, and scalable file system that can be shared between multiple containers. It provides high availability and fault tolerance by replicating data across multiple Availability Zones. Amazon EFS is compatible with Amazon EKS and AWS Fargate, and can be registered in a StorageClass object on an EKS cluster. Amazon EBS volumes are not supported by AWS Fargate, and cannot be shared between multiple containers without using EBS Multi-Attach, which has limitations and performance implications. EBS Multi-Attach also requires the volumes to be in the same Availability Zone as the worker nodes, which reduces availability and fault tolerance. Synchronizing data between multiple EFS file systems using AWS Lambda is unnecessary, complex, and prone to errors. References:

Amazon EFS Storage Classes

Amazon EKSStorage Classes

Amazon EBS Multi-Attach

This option is the only solution that meets the requirements because it allows the company to encrypt the data with its own encryption keys and tools outside the AWS Cloud. By encrypting the data at the company’s data center before storing the data in the S3 bucket, the company can ensure that the data is encrypted in transit and at rest, and that the company has full control over the encryption keys and processes. This option also avoids the need to use any AWS encryption services or features, which may not be compatible with the company’s security policies or compliance standards.

A. Encrypt the data in the S3 bucket with server-side encryption (SSE) that uses an AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) customer managed key. This option does not meet the requirements because it does not allow the company to manage the encryption keys outside the AWS Cloud. Although the company can create and use its own customer managed key in AWSKMS, the key is still stored and managed by AWS KMS, which is a service within the AWS Cloud. Moreover, the company still needs to use the AWS encryption features and APIs to encrypt and decrypt the data in the S3 bucket, which may not be compatible with the company’s security policies or compliance standards.

B. Encrypt the data in the S3 bucket with server-side encryption (SSE) that uses an AWS Key Management Service (AWS KMS) AWS managed key. This option does not meet the requirements because it does not allow the company to manage the encryption keys outside the AWS Cloud. In this option, the company uses the default AWS managed key in AWS KMS, which is created and managed by AWS on behalf of the company. The company has no control over the key rotation, deletion, or recovery policies. Moreover, the company still needs to use the AWS encryption features and APIs to encrypt and decrypt the data in the S3 bucket, which may not be compatible with the company’s security policies or compliance standards.

C. Encrypt the data in the S3 bucket with the default server-side encryption (SSE). This option does not meet the requirements because it does not allow the company to manage the encryption keys outside the AWS Cloud. In this option, the company uses the default server-side encryption with Amazon S3 managed keys (SSE-S3), which is applied to every bucket in Amazon S3. The company has no visibility or control over the encryption keys, which are managed by Amazon S3. Moreover, the company still needs to use the AWS encryption features and APIs to encrypt and decrypt the data in the S3 bucket, which may not be compatible with the company’s security policies or compliance standards.

CloudWatch cross-account observability is a feature that allows you to monitor and troubleshoot applications that span multiple accounts within a Region. You canseamlessly search, visualize, and analyze your metrics, logs, traces, and Application Insights applications in any of the linked accounts without account boundaries1. To enable CloudWatch cross-account observability, you need to set up one or more AWS accounts as monitoring accounts and link them with multiple source accounts. A monitoring account is a central AWS account that can view and interact with observability data shared by other accounts. A source account is an individual AWS account that shares observability data and resources with one or more monitoring accounts1. To create links between monitoring accounts and source accounts, you can use the CloudWatch console, the AWS CLI, or the AWS API. You can also use AWS Organizations to link accounts in an organization or organizational unit to the monitoring account1. CloudWatch provides a CloudFormation template that you can deploy in each source account to share observability data with the monitoring account. The template creates a sink resource in the monitoring account and an observability link resource in the source account. The template also creates the necessary IAM roles and policies to allow cross-account access to the observability data2. Therefore, the solution that meets the requirements of the question is to enable CloudWatch cross-account observability for the monitoring account and deploy the CloudFormation template provided by the monitoring account in each AWS account to share the data with the monitoring account.

The other options are not valid because:

Service control policies (SCPs) are a type of organization policy that you can use to manage permissions in your organization. SCPs offer central control over the maximum available permissions for all accounts in your organization, allowing youto ensure your accounts stay within your organization’s access control guidelines3. SCPs do not provide access to CloudWatch in the monitoring account, but rather restrict the actions that users and roles can perform in the source accounts. SCPs are not required toenable CloudWatch cross-account observability, as the CloudFormation template creates the necessary IAM roles and policies for cross-account access2.

IAM users are entities that you create in AWS to represent the people or applications that use them to interact with AWS. IAM users can have permissions to access the resources in your AWS account4. Configuring a new IAM user in the monitoring account and an IAM policy in each AWS account to have access to query and visualize the CloudWatch data in the account is not a valid solution, as it does not enable CloudWatch cross-account observability. This solution would require the IAM user to switch between different accounts to view the observability data, which is not seamless and efficient. Moreover, this solution would not allow the IAM user to search, visualize, and analyze metrics, logs, traces, and Application Insights applications across multiple accounts in a single place1.

Cross-account IAM policies are policies that allow you to delegate access to resources that are in different AWS accounts that you own. You attach a cross-account policy to a user or group in one account, and then specify which accounts theuser or group can access5. Creating a new IAM user in the monitoring account and cross-account IAM policies in each AWS account is not avalid solution, as it does not enable CloudWatch cross-account observability. This solution would also require the IAM user to switch between different accounts to view the observability data, which is not seamless and efficient. Moreover, this solution would not allow the IAM user to search, visualize, and analyze metrics, logs, traces, and Application Insights applications across multiple accounts in a single place1.

To meet the requirements of the web application in the most secure manner, the company should create a Route 53 Resolver outbound endpoint, create a resolver rule, and associate the resolver rule with the VPC. This solution will allow the application to use private DNS records to communicate with the on-premises services from a VPC. Route 53 Resolver is a service that enables DNS resolution between on-premises networks and AWS VPCs. An outbound endpoint is a set of IP addresses that Resolver uses to forward DNS queries from a VPC to resolvers on an on-premises network. A resolver rule is a rule that specifies the domain names for which Resolver forwards DNS queries to the IP addresses that you specify in the rule. By creating an outbound endpoint and a resolver rule, and associating them with the VPC, the company can securely resolve DNS queries for the on-premises services using private DNS records12.

The other options are not correct because they do not meet the requirements or are not secure. Creating a Route 53 Resolver inbound endpoint, creating a resolver rule, and associating the resolver rule with the VPC is not correct because this solution will allow DNS queries from on-premises networks to access resources in a VPC, not vice versa. An inbound endpoint is a set of IP addresses that Resolver uses to receive DNS queries from resolvers on an on-premises network1. Creating a Route 53 private hosted zone and associating it with the VPC is not correct because this solution will only allow DNS resolution for resources within the VPC or other VPCs that are associated with the same hosted zone. A private hosted zone is a container for DNS records that are only accessible from one or more VPCs3. Creating a Route 53 public hosted zone and creating a record for each service to allow service communication is not correct because this solution will expose the on-premises services to the public internet, which is not secure. A public hosted zone is a container for DNS records that are accessible from anywhere on the internet3.

AWS DataSync is a service that makes it easy to move large amounts of data online between on-premises storage and AWS storage services. AWS DataSync can transfer data at speeds up to 10 times faster than open-source tools by using a purpose-built network protocol and parallelizing data transfers. AWS DataSync also handles encryption, data integrity verification, and bandwidth optimization. To use AWS DataSync, users need to deploy a DataSync agent on their on-premises servers, which connects to the NFS servers and syncs the data to Amazon S3. Users can schedule periodic or one-time sync tasks and monitor the progress and status of the transfers.

The other options are not correct because they are either not cost-effective or not suitable for the use case. Setting up AWS Glue to copy the data from the on-premises servers to Amazon S3 is not cost-effective because AWS Glue is a serverless data integration service that is mainly used for extract, transform, and load (ETL) operations, not for simple data backup. Setting up an SFTP sync using AWS Transfer for SFTP to sync data from on premises to Amazon S3 is not cost-effective because AWS Transfer for SFTP is a fully managed service that provides secure file transfer using the SFTP protocol, which is more suitable for exchanging data with third parties than for backing up data. Setting up an AWS Direct Connect connection between the on-premises data center and a VPC, and copying the data to Amazon S3 is not cost-effective because AWS Direct Connect is a dedicated network connection between AWS and the on-premises location, which has high upfront costs and requires additional configuration.

These two steps will meet the requirements with the fewest changes to the application because they will enable the company to replicate the data to the new S3 buckets and minimize latency for both video streaming and uploads. One-way replication from the us-east-2 S3 bucket to the other two S3 buckets will ensure that the data is synchronized across all three regions. The company can use S3 Cross-Region Replication (CRR) to automatically copy objects across buckets in different AWS Regions. CRR can help the company achieve lower latency and compliance requirements by keeping copies of their data in different regions. Creating an S3 Multi-Region Access Point and modifying the application to use its ARN will allow the company to access the data through a single global endpoint. An S3 Multi-Region Access Point is a globally unique name that can be used to access objects stored in S3 buckets across multiple regions. It automatically routes requests to the closest S3 bucket with the lowest latency. By using an S3 Multi-Region Access Point, the company can simplify the application architecture and improve the performance and reliability of the application.

This option is the most suitable way to improve the game’s metadata load times without migrating the database. Amazon ElastiCache for Redis is a fully managed, in-memory data store that provides sub-millisecond latency and high throughput for read-intensive workloads. You can use it as a caching layer in front of your RDS DB instance to store frequently accessed metadata and reduce the load on thedatabase. You can also take advantage of Redis features such as snapshots, replication, and data persistence to ensure data durability and availability. ElastiCache for Redis scales automatically to meet your demand and integrates with other AWS services such as CloudFormation, CloudWatch, and IAM.

Option A is not optimal because migrating the database to Amazon Aurora with Aurora Replicas would incur additional costs and complexity. Amazon Aurora is a relational database service that provides high performance, availability, and compatibility with MySQL and PostgreSQL. Aurora Replicas are read-only copies of the primary database that can be used for scaling read capacity and enhancing availability. However, migrating the database to Aurora would require modifying the application code, testing the compatibility, and performing the data migration. Moreover, Aurora Replicas may not provide sub-millisecond response times as ElastiCache for Redis does.

Option B is not optimal because migrating the database to Amazon DynamoDB with global tables would incur additional costs and complexity. Amazon DynamoDB is a NoSQL database service that provides fast and flexible data access for any scale. Global tables are a feature of DynamoDB that enables you to replicate your data across multiple AWS Regions for high availability and performance. However, migrating the database to DynamoDB would require changing the data model, modifying the application code, and performing the data migration. Moreover, global tables may not be necessary for the game’s metadata, as they are mainly used for cross-region data access and disaster recovery.

Option D is not optimal because adding an Amazon ElastiCache for Memcached layer in front of the database would not provide the same capabilities as ElastiCache for Redis. Amazon ElastiCache for Memcached is another fully managed, in-memory data store that provides high performance and scalability for caching workloads. However, Memcached does not support snapshots, replication, or data persistence, which means that the cached data may be lost in case of a node failure or a cache eviction. Moreover, Memcached does not integrate with other AWS services as well as Redis does. Therefore, ElastiCache for Redis is a better choice for this scenario. References:

What Is Amazon ElastiCache for Redis?

What Is Amazon Aurora?

What Is Amazon DynamoDB?

What Is Amazon ElastiCache for Memcached?

These two steps will meet the requirements because they will provide high availability and scalability for the web application without rewriting it. Amazon EC2 Auto Scaling allows you to automatically adjust the number of EC2 instances in response to changes in demand. By configuring Auto Scaling with multiple Availability Zones in private subnets, you can ensure that your web application is distributed across isolated and fault-tolerant locations, and that your instances are not directly exposed to the internet. An Application Load Balancer operates at the application layer and distributes incoming web traffic across multiple targets, such as EC2 instances, containers, or Lambda functions. By configuring an Application Load Balancer in a public subnet, you can enable your web application to handle requests from the internet and route them to the appropriate targets in the private subnets.

This solution meets the following requirements:

It is the least effort, as it does not require any additional AWS services, custom scripts, or data processing steps. Amazon Athena is a serverless interactive query service that allows you to analyze data in Amazon S3 using standard SQL. You can use Athena to query CloudTrail logs directly from the S3 bucket where they are stored, without any data loading or transformation. You can also use the AWS Management Console, the AWS CLI, or the Athena API to run and manage your queries.

It is effective, as it allows you to filter, aggregate, and join CloudTrail log data using SQL syntax. You can use various SQL functions and operators to specify the criteria for identifyingAccess Denied and Unauthorized errors, such as the error code, the user identity, the event source, the event name, the event time, and the resource ARN. You can also use subqueries, views, and common table expressions to simplify and optimize your queries.

It is flexible, as it allows you to customize and save your queries for future use. You can also export the query results to other formats, such as CSV or JSON, or integrate them with other AWS services, such as Amazon QuickSight, for further analysis and visualization.

The least outstanding requests (LOR) algorithm is a load balancing algorithm that distributes incoming requests to the target with the fewest outstanding requests. This helps to avoid overloading any single target and improves the overall performance and availability of the web application. The LOR algorithmcan use the RequestCount and TargetResponseTime CloudWatch metrics to determine the number of outstanding requests and the response time of each target. These metrics measure the number of requests processed by each target and the time elapsed after the request leaves the load balancer until a response from the target is received by the load balancer, respectively. By using these metrics, the LOR algorithm can route new requests to the targets that are less busy and more responsive, and avoid sending requests to the targets that are already overloaded or slow. This solution meets the requirements of the company.

The solution that will meet the requirements is to deploy AWS Storage Gateway using cached volumes and use Storage Gateway to store data in Amazon S3 while retaining copies of frequently accessed data subsets locally. This solution will allow the company to migrate its storage infrastructure to AWS while minimizing bandwidth costs, as it will only transfer data that is not cached locally. The solution will also allow for immediate retrieval of data at no additional cost, as the cached volumes will provide low-latencyaccess to the most recently used data. The data stored in Amazon S3 will be durable, scalable, and secure.

The other solutions are not as effective as the first one because they either do not meet the requirements or introduce additional costs or complexity. Deploying Amazon S3 Glacier Vault and enabling expedited retrieval will not meet the requirements, as it will incur additional costs for both storage and retrieval. Amazon S3 Glacier is a low-cost storage service for data archivingand backup, but it has longer retrieval times than Amazon S3. Expedited retrieval is a feature that allows faster access to data, but it charges a higher fee per GB retrieved. Provisioned retrieval capacity is a feature that reserves dedicated capacity for expedited retrievals, but it also charges a monthly fee per provisioned capacity unit. Deploying AWS Storage Gateway using stored volumes to store data locally and use Storage Gateway to asynchronously back up point-in-time snapshots of the data to Amazon S3 will not meet the requirements, as it will not migrate the storage infrastructure to AWS, but only create backups. Stored volumes are volumes that store the primary data locally and back up snapshots to Amazon S3. This solution will not reduce the storage capacity needed on-premises, nor will it leverage the benefits of cloud storage. Deploying AWS Direct Connect to connect with the on-premises data center and configuring AWS Storage Gateway to store data locally and use Storage Gateway to asynchronously back up point-in-time snapshots of the data to Amazon S3 will not meet the requirements, as it will also not migrate the storage infrastructure to AWS, but only create backups. AWS Direct Connect is a service that establishes a dedicated network connection between the on-premises data center and AWS, which can reduce network costs and increase bandwidth. However, this solution will also not reduce the storage capacity needed on-premises, nor will it leverage the benefits of cloud storage.

To design a resilient solution that can improve the recovery time for the system, a solutions architect should recommend creating an Amazon CloudWatch alarm to recover the EC2 instance in case of failure. This solution has the following benefits:

It allows the EC2 instance to be automatically recovered when a system status check failure occurs, such as loss of network connectivity, loss of system power, software issues on the physical host, or hardware issues on the physical host that impact network reachability1.

It preserves the instance ID, private IP addresses, Elastic IP addresses, and all instance metadata of the original instance. A recovered instance is identical to the original instance, except for any data that is in-memory, which is lost during the recovery process1.

It does not require any modification of the application code or the EC2 instance configuration. The solutions architect can create a CloudWatch alarm using the AWS Management Console, the AWS CLI, or the CloudWatch API2.

This option is the most operationally efficient way to meet the requirements because it allows the company to monitor and analyze the database login activity across all the accounts in the organization. By publishing the Aurora general logs to a log group in Amazon CloudWatch Logs, the company can enable the logging of the database connections, disconnections, and failed authentication attempts. By exporting the log data to a central Amazon S3 bucket, the company can store the log data in a durable and cost-effective way and use other AWS services or tools to perform further analysis or alerting on the log data. For example, the company can use Amazon Athena to query the log data in Amazon S3, or use Amazon SNS to send notifications based on the log data.

A. Attach service control policies (SCPs) to the root of the organization to identify the failed login attempts. This option is not effective because SCPs are not designed to identify the failed login attempts, but to restrict the actions that the users and roles can perform in the member accounts of the organization. SCPs are applied to the AWS API calls, not to the database login attempts. Moreover, SCPs do not provide any logging or analysis capabilities for the database activity.

B. Enable the Amazon RDS Protection feature in Amazon GuardDuty for the member accounts of the organization. This option is not optimal because the Amazon RDS Protection feature in Amazon GuardDuty is not available for Aurora PostgreSQL databases, but only for Amazon RDS for MySQL and Amazon RDS for MariaDB databases. Moreover, the Amazon RDS Protection feature does not monitor the database login attempts, but the network and API activity related to the RDS instances.

D. Publish all the Aurora PostgreSQL database events in AWS CloudTrail to a central Amazon S3 bucket. This option is not sufficient because AWS CloudTrail does not capture the database login attempts, but only the AWS API calls made by or on behalf of the Aurora PostgreSQLdatabase. For example, AWS CloudTrail can record the events such as creating, modifying, or deleting the database instances, clusters, or snapshots, but not the events such as connecting, disconnecting, or failing to authenticate to the database.

There's a table here that specifies that VPC Flow logs can go directly to S3. Does not need to go via CloudTrail and then to S3.Nor via CW.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonCloudWatch/latest/logs/AWS-logs-and-resource-policy.html#AWS-logs-infrastructure-S3

Create a t2 micro Amazon EC2 instance. Deploy a LAMP (Linux Apache MySQL, PHP/Perl/Python) stack to host the webpage. Use client-side scripting to build the contact form. Integrate the form with Amazon WorkMail. This solution will provide the company with the necessary components to host the contact form page and integrate it with Amazon WorkMail at the lowest cost. Option A requires the use of Amazon ECS, which is more expensive than EC2, and Option B requires the use of Amazon API Gateway, which is also more expensive than EC2. Option C requires the use of Amazon Lightsail, which is more expensive than EC2.

Using AWS Lambda with Amazon API Gateway - AWS Lambda

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/lambda/latest/dg/services-apigateway.html

AWS Lambda FAQs

https://aws.amazon.com/lambda/faqs/

Amazon Transcribe now supports speaker labeling for streaming transcription. Amazon Transcribe is an automatic speech recognition (ASR) service that makes it easy for you to convert speech-to-text. In live audio transcription, each stream of audio may contain multiplespeakers. Now you can conveniently turn on the ability to label speakers, thus helping to identify who is saying what in the output transcript.https://aws.amazon.com/about-aws/whats-new/2020/08/amazon-transcribe-supports-speaker-labeling-streaming-transcription/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/amazondynamodb/latest/developerguide/vpc-endpoints-dynamodb.html

A VPC endpoint for DynamoDB enables Amazon EC2 instances in your VPC to use their private IP addresses to access DynamoDB with no exposure to the public internet. Your EC2 instances do not require public IP addresses, and you don't need an internet gateway, a NAT device, or a virtual private gateway in your VPC. You use endpoint policies to control access to DynamoDB. Traffic between your VPC and the AWS service does not leave the Amazon network.