SY0-701 Exam Dumps - CompTIA Security+ Questions and Answers

The best answer is C. Watering hole.

A watering hole attack occurs when an attacker compromises a website that a targeted group of users commonly visits. The attacker chooses that site because they know the intended victims are likely to access it during normal work activities. Once the site is compromised, the attacker can deliver malware, steal credentials, or exploit browser vulnerabilities.

This exactly matches the scenario in the question: a website that multiple employees frequently visit is targeted for compromise.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Supply chainA supply chain attack targets vendors, software providers, or service providers in order to affect downstream customers. That is different from compromising a commonly visited website for a specific group of users.

B. TyposquattingTyposquatting involves creating a fraudulent website with a name similar to a legitimate one so users accidentally visit it. The question describes compromising an existing site people already visit, not creating a lookalike domain.

D. ImpersonationImpersonation involves pretending to be a trusted person or entity. It does not specifically describe compromising a frequently visited website.

From a Security+ perspective, a compromised site used to target a specific population is a classic watering hole attack, so C is correct.

Threat hunting is the process of proactively searching for signs of malicious activity or compromise in a network, rather than waiting for alerts or indicators of compromise (IOCs) to appear. Threat hunting can help identify new tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) used by malicious actors, as well as uncover hidden or stealthy threats that may have evaded detection by security tools. Threat hunting requires a combination of skills, tools, and methodologies, such as hypothesis generation, data collection and analysis, threat intelligence, and incident response. Threat hunting can also help improve the security posture of an organization by providing feedback and recommendations for security improvements. References = CompTIA Security+ Certification Exam Objectives, Domain 4.1: Given a scenario, analyze potential indicators of malicious activity. CompTIA Security+ Study Guide (SY0-701), Chapter 4: Threat Detection and Response, page 153. Threat Hunting – SY0-701 CompTIA Security+ : 4.1, Video 3:18. CompTIA Security+ Certification Exam SY0-701 Practice Test 1, Question 3.

RBAC stands for Role-Based Access Control, which is a method of restricting access to data and resources based on the roles or responsibilities of users. RBAC simplifies the management of permissions by assigning roles to users and granting access rights to roles, rather than to individual users. RBAC can help enforce the principle of least privilege and reduce the risk of unauthorized access or data leakage. The other options are not as suitable for the scenario asRBAC, as they either do not prevent access based on responsibilities, or do not apply a simplified format. References: CompTIA Security+ Study Guide: Exam SY0-701, 9th Edition, page 133 1

A host-based firewall controls incoming and outgoing network traffic on a device by enforcing security rules, effectively blocking unwanted or insecure communications. It is specifically designed to protect the device from unauthorized access and malicious traffic.

System hardening (A) reduces vulnerabilities by disabling unnecessary services and patching but does not control communications dynamically. Intrusion detection systems (C) detect suspicious traffic but typically do not block it (unless paired with prevention). Anti-malware (D) protects against malicious software but not directly network communication filtering.

Host-based firewalls are a fundamental component of endpoint security highlighted in the Security Operations domain of SY0-701【6:Chapter 11†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】.

The best answer is D. Submit the device to the security team without connecting it.

An unknown USB drive found in a parking lot is a classic example of a potential social engineering or malware delivery attack. Attackers may intentionally leave infected removable media where employees will find it and plug it into a system. The safest action is to not connect the device at all and instead turn it over to the security team for proper handling.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Notify the file owner after reviewing the contents of the drive.Reviewing the contents requires connecting the drive, which could infect the system or trigger malicious code.

B. Use an air-gapped system to open the files without exposing the network.Even an air-gapped system can be put at risk. Regular employees should not analyze suspicious media on their own.

C. Wipe the drive immediately using a secure method.This destroys possible evidence and still requires handling the device in a way that may not follow incident procedures.

From a Security+ standpoint, removable media from unknown sources should be treated as suspicious. Proper procedure is to avoid connecting it and escalate to the security team. Therefore, D is the correct answer.

Secure Access Service Edge (SASE) is the technology best suited for preventing remote users from accessing malicious URLs. According to the CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 framework, SASE integrates cloud-native security capabilities such as DNS filtering, secure web gateways, CASB, and URL categorization, all delivered inline. This means every URL request from a remote user is checked in real time for reputation, content, and category before access is granted.

This solution is specifically designed for remote workforces because security enforcement happens in the cloud, regardless of user location—eliminating reliance on on-premise proxies or VPN routing. SASE also enables consistent policy application and real-time enforcement across distributed networks.

A VPN (A) only encrypts traffic; it does not perform URL reputation checks. IDS (C) detects malicious activity but does not block URL access. SD-WAN (D) optimizes WAN routing but is not focused on content filtering or URL reputation.

Therefore, SASE is the correct and most effective solution for inline URL inspection and preventing remote users from reaching malicious sites.

An endpoint detection and response (EDR) system is a security tool that monitors and analyzes the activities and behaviors of endpoints, such as computers, laptops, mobile devices, and servers. An EDR system can detect, prevent, and respond to various types of threats, such as malware, ransomware, phishing, and advanced persistent threats (APTs). One of the features of an EDR system is to block the automatic execution of downloaded programs, which can prevent malicious code from running on the endpoint when a user clicks on a link in a phishing message. This can reduce the impact of a phishing attack and protect the endpoint from compromise. Updating the EDR policies to block automatic execution of downloaded programs is a technical control that can mitigate the risk of phishing, regardless of the user’s awareness or behavior. Therefore, this is the best answer among the given options.

The other options are not as effective as updating the EDR policies, because they rely on administrative or physical controls that may not be sufficient to prevent or stop a phishing attack. Placing posters around the office to raise awareness of common phishing activities is a physical control that can increase the user’s knowledge of phishing, but it may not change their behavior or prevent them from clicking on a link in a phishing message. Implementing email security filters to prevent phishing emails from being delivered is an administrative control that can reduce the exposure to phishing, but it may not be able to block all phishing emails, especially if they are crafted to bypass the filters. Creating additional training for users to recognize the signs of phishing attempts is an administrative control that can improve the user’s skills of phishing detection, but it may not guarantee that they will always be vigilant or cautious when receiving an email. Therefore, these options are not the best answer for this question. References = Endpoint Detection and Response – CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 – 2.2, video at 5:30; CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 Certification Study Guide, page 163.

Memory injection vulnerabilities allow unauthorized code or commands to be executed within a software program, leading to abnormal behavior such as generating outbound traffic over random high ports. This issue often arises from software not properly validating or encoding input, which can be exploited by attackers to inject malicious code.References: CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 course content and official CompTIA study resources.

The most important security concern when using legacy systems is the lack of vendor support. Without support from the vendor, systems may not receive critical security patches and updates, leaving them vulnerable to exploitation. This lack of support can result in increased risk of security breaches, as vulnerabilities discovered in the software may never be addressed.

References = CompTIA Security+ SY0-701 study materials, particularly in the context of risk management and the challenges posed by legacy systems​​.

This describes a watering hole attack, where an attacker compromises a website frequently visited by the target group and delivers malicious payloads, such as automatic downloads.

XSS (A) injects scripts into web pages, typosquatting (C) involves fake websites with misspelled URLs, and buffer overflow (D) exploits memory but does not involve website compromise with automatic downloads.

Watering hole attacks are well-known web-based threats covered in SY0-701【6:Chapter 2†CompTIA Security+ Study Guide】.

The lessons learned phase of an incident response process involves reviewing the incident and generating reports. This phase helps identify what went well, what needs improvement, and what changes should be made to prevent future incidents. Documentation and reporting are essential parts of this phase to ensure that the findings are recorded and used for future planning.

Recovery focuses on restoring services and normal operations.

Preparation involves creating plans and policies for potential incidents, not reporting.

Containment deals with isolating and mitigating the effects of the incident, not generating reports​​.

Multifactor authentication (MFA) requires users to provide two or more of the following categories:

Something you know (password/PIN)

Something you have (token/smart card)

Something you are (biometrics)

Authentication tokens (A) qualify as something you have, such as hardware tokens, OTP apps, or smart cards.

Biometrics (C) qualify as something you are, such as fingerprint scans, facial recognition, or iris scans. Using these two together easily establishes MFA.

Least privilege (B) is an authorization principle, not an MFA factor. LDAP (D) is a directory service protocol, not an MFA mechanism. Password vaulting (E) assists with credential storage but does not implement MFA. SAML (F) is a federation protocol used for Single Sign-On (SSO), not inherently MFA.

Thus, the correct MFA components are A: Authentication tokens and C: Biometrics.

Preparation is the phase in the incident response process when a security analyst reviews roles and responsibilities, as well as the policies and procedures for handling incidents. Preparation also involves gathering and maintaining the necessary tools, resources, and contacts for responding to incidents. Preparation can help a security analyst to be ready and proactive when an incident occurs, as well as to reduce the impact and duration of the incident.

Some of the activities that a security analyst performs during the preparation phase are:

Defining the roles and responsibilities of the incident response team members, such as the incident manager, the incident coordinator, the technical lead, the communications lead, and the legal advisor.

Establishing the incident response plan, which outlines the objectives, scope, authority, and procedures for responding to incidents, as well as the escalation and reporting mechanisms.

Developing the incident response policy, which defines the types and categories of incidents, the severity levels, the notification and reporting requirements, and the roles and responsibilities of the stakeholders.

Creating the incident response playbook, which provides the step-by-step guidance and checklists for handling specific types of incidents, such as denial-of-service, ransomware, phishing, or data breach.

Acquiring and testing the incident response tools, such as network and host-based scanners, malware analysis tools, forensic tools, backup and recovery tools, and communication and collaboration tools.

Identifying and securing the incident response resources, such as the incident response team, the incident response location, the evidence storage, and the external support.

Building and maintaining the incident response contacts, such as the internal and external stakeholders, the law enforcement agencies, the regulatory bodies, and the media.

Sanitization is the process of thoroughly removing or wiping all data from devices before disposal or donation to prevent sensitive information from being recovered or leaked.