CFE-Fraud-Prevention-and-Deterrence Exam Dumps - ACFE Certified Fraud Examiner Questions and Answers

The Fraud Prevention and Deterrence Manual explains that when an external auditor identifies matters that could affect the reliability of the financial statements, those matters must be communicated appropriately. Under the discussion of communications to management and with those charged with governance, the manual states that if the auditor identifies fraud or suspects fraud involving management, key control personnel, or matters that could lead to a material misstatement, the auditor must communicate these matters to those charged with governance on a timely basis. Significant internal control deficiencies that could result in material misstatement fit within this governance communication framework. The auditor is not responsible for fixing the controls personally, suspending the engagement automatically, or reporting directly to law enforcement in the ordinary course. Therefore, the correct response is written communication to those charged with governance.

=============

Under ISA 240, when an auditor identifies or suspects fraud involving management, especially senior management, the auditor must communicate the matter to those charged with governance unless clearly inappropriate. Because Jeffrey is the CEO, reporting directly to him would not be appropriate. The auditor should not immediately report to a government authority unless law, regulation, or professional duty requires external reporting. The auditor also should not remain silent simply because legal liability might exist. Confronting the CEO to obtain a confession is not the auditor’s role and could compromise the audit, investigation, or evidence. Those charged with governance, such as the board or audit committee, are responsible for oversight and should be informed of suspected senior management fraud. Therefore, option B is correct.

Tone at the Top:

Management must set a strong example by adhering to the same ethical standards as employees.

Visible adherence builds trust and reinforces an anti-fraud culture.

Analysis of Other Options:

A. Checklist of initiatives:Helpful but insufficient by itself.

B. Dissuading challenges:This is counterproductive, as it discourages transparency and accountability.

D. All of the above:Incorrect, as Option B is detrimental to an anti-fraud culture.

Conclusion:Visibly adhering to ethics policies is the most effective action.

Composition of Fraud Risk Assessment Teams:

Effective teams require diverse perspectives, skills, and experiences to identify and address fraud risks comprehensively.

Why C is Incorrect:

Limiting team size to three individuals restricts diversity and may not provide sufficient expertise for a thorough assessment. Larger teams, with a range of skills, are often necessary.

Why Other Options are Correct:

A:Experience in gathering information is critical for the effectiveness of the team.

B:Including external experts adds objectivity.

D:Diverse perspectives enhance the assessment ' s scope​​.

References for All Questions:

ACFE Fraud Examination Guide and Standards​​.

ISA standards on audit procedures and unpredictability​​.

Fraud risk assessment guidelines from COSO and ACFE resources​​.

 Criminogenic Nature of Organizations:

Research suggests that organizational culture and pressures can override an individual ' s personal values, especially when authority figures issue direct orders to engage in unethical behavior.

 Why B is Correct:

Strong personal values do not guarantee resistance to unethical orders, as obedience to authority is a powerful psychological force, as seen in studies like the Milgram experiment​​.

 Implication for Fraud Prevention:

Organizations must establish strong ethical environments to reduce the influence of authority pressure on employees