CISM Exam Dumps - Isaca Certification Questions and Answers

 Introducing security requirements during the initiation phase would BEST ensure that security is integrated during application development because it would allow the security objectives and controls to be defined and aligned with the business needs and risk appetite before any design or coding is done. This would also facilitate the security by design approach, which is the most effective method to enhance the security of applications and application development activities1. Introducing security requirements early would also enable the collaboration between security professionals and developers, the identification and specification of security architectures, and the integration and testing of security controls throughout the development life cycle2. Employing global security standards during development processes (A) would help to ensure the consistency and quality of security practices, but it would not necessarily ensure that security is integrated during application development. Providing training on secure development practices to programmers (B) would help to raise the awareness and skills of developers, but it would not ensure that security is integrated during application development. Performing application security testing during acceptance testing © would help to verify the security of the application before deployment, but it would not ensure that security is integrated during application development. It would also be too late to identify and remediate any security issues that could have been prevented or mitigated earlier in the development process. References = 1: Five Key Components of an Application Security Program - ISACA1; 2: CISM Domain – Information Security Program Development | Infosec2

The answer to the question is B. Spread a site across multiple ISPs. This is because spreading a site across multiple Internet service providers (ISPs) can help to reduce the impact of a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack by increasing the bandwidth and redundancy of the site, and making it harder for the attacker to target and overwhelm a single point of failure. Spreading a site across multiple ISPs can also help to distribute the traffic load and balance the performance of the site, and to mitigate the effects of regional or network-specific outages or disruptions. Spreading a site across multiple ISPs can be done by using various techniques, such as anycast routing, content delivery networks (CDNs), or cloud-based services12.

Spreading a site across multiple ISPs can help to reduce the impact of a DDoS attack by increasing the bandwidth and redundancy of the site, and making it harder for the attacker to target and overwhelm a single point of failure. (From CISM Manual or related resources)

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.1, page 2091; DDoS Attacks—A Cyberthreat and Possible Solutions2

The first thing that should be done when a SIEM flags a potential event is A. Validate the event is not a false positive. This is because a false positive is an event that is incorrectly identified as malicious or suspicious by the SIEM, when in fact it is benign or normal. False positives can waste the time and resources of the security team, and reduce the trust and confidence in the SIEM system. Therefore, it is important to verify the accuracy and validity of the event before initiating any further actions, such as incident response, escalation, or compensating controls. Validation can be done by analyzing the event data, comparing it with the baseline or normal behavior, and checking for any anomalies or indicators of compromise.

A false positive is an event that is incorrectly identified as malicious or suspicious by the SIEM, when in fact it is benign or normal. Validation can be done by analyzing the event data, comparing it with the baseline or normal behavior, and checking for any anomalies or indicators of compromise. (From CISM Manual or related resources)

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.1, page 2091; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 9th Edition, Question 72, page 19

 Before implementing any changes to the security incident response plan, the information security manager should first conduct a gap analysis to identify the current state of the plan and compare it with the new requirements. A gap analysis is a systematic process of evaluating the differences between the current and desired state of a system, process, or program. A gap analysis can help to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the existing plan, the gaps that need to be addressed, the priorities and dependencies of the actions, and the resources and costs involved. A gap analysis can also help to create a business case for the changes and justify the investment. A gap analysis can be conducted using various methods and tools, such as frameworks, standards, benchmarks, questionnaires, interviews, audits, or tests1234.

References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 1631

CISM certified information security manager study guide, page 452

How To Conduct An Information Security Gap Analysis3

PROACTIVE DETECTION - GOOD PRACTICES GAP ANALYSIS RECOMMENDATIONS4

A threat analysis will best identify the external influences to an organization’s information security because it involves identifying and evaluating the sources and likelihood of potential adverse events that could affect the organization’s assets, operations, or reputation. External influences include factors such as emerging technologies, social media, business environment, risk tolerance, regulatory requirements, third-party considerations, and threat landscape1. A threat analysis can help the organization to align its information security strategy with its business objectives and risk appetite, and to prioritize and mitigate the most relevant and impactful threats. A business impact analysis (BIA) is a process of assessing the potential consequences of a disruption to the organization’s critical business functions or processes. A BIA does not directly identify the external influences to the organization’s information security, but rather the impact of those influences on the organization’s continuity and recovery. A gap analysis is a process of comparing the current state of the organization’s information security with a desired or expected state, based on best practices, standards, or frameworks. A gap analysis does not directly identify the external influences to the organization’s information security, but rather the areas of improvement or compliance. A vulnerability analysis is a process of identifying and evaluating the weaknesses or flaws in the organization’s information systems or processes that could be exploited by threats. A vulnerability analysis does not directly identify the external influences to the organization’s information security, but rather the exposure or susceptibility of the organization to those influences. References = CISM Review Manual, 15th Edition, pages 22-232; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Knowledge Statement 1.113

Threat analysis is a process that is used to identify and assess the external influences or threats that could potentially affect an organization's information security. It is used to identify potential risks and develop strategies to mitigate or reduce those risks. Threat analysis involves analyzing the environment, identifying potential threats and their potential impacts, and then evaluating the organization's current security measures and developing strategies to address any deficiencies.

Complying with regulations regarding notification is the most important reason for an organization to communicate to affected parties that a security incident has occurred, as it helps to avoid legal penalties, fines, or sanctions that may result from failing to notify the relevant authorities, customers, or other stakeholders in a timely and appropriate manner. Additionally, complying with regulations regarding notification may also help to preserve the trust and reputation of the organization, as well as to facilitate the investigation and resolution of the incident.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 3151; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 4, Task 4.5

A gap analysis is a tool that helps to identify the current state of compliance and the desired state of compliance, as well as the actions needed to achieve the desired state. A gap analysis should be done before implementing any specific controls or solutions, such as encryption, data minimization, or ROI analysis.

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 65; Information Security Architecture: Gap Assessment and Prioritization, ISACA Journal, volume 2, 2018.

A penetration test is a proactive way to identify and remediate security vulnerabilities in a network. When a penetration test reveals a security exposure due to a firewall that is not configured correctly, the information security manager’s best course of action is to ensure a plan with milestones is developed to address the issue. This plan should include the root cause analysis, the corrective actions, the responsible parties, the deadlines, and the verification methods. This way, the information security manager can ensure that the security exposure is resolved in a timely and effective manner, and that the firewall configuration is aligned with the security policy and the business objectives.

References =

CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), page 193: “The information security manager should ensure that a plan with milestones is developed to address the issues identified during the penetration test.”

How to configure a network firewall: Walkthrough: “A good network firewall is essential. Learn the basics of configuring a network firewall, including stateful vs. stateless firewalls and access control lists in this episode of Cyber Work Applied.”

Which of the following is the BEST way to evaluate whether the information security program aligns with corporate governance?

A. Survey mid-level management.

B. Analyze industry benchmarks.

C. Conduct a gap analysis.

D. Review internal audit reports.

The data owner is the person who has the authority and responsibility to classify, grant access, and monitor the use of the CRM data. The data owner should ensure that the data is protected according to its classification and business requirements. The data custodian is the person who implements the controls and procedures to protect the data as directed by the data owner. The information security manager is the person who advises the data owner on the best practices and standards for data security. The internal IT audit is the function that evaluates the effectiveness and compliance of the data security controls and procedures.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook1, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Information Security Roles and Responsibilities, Subsection: Data Owner, Page 23.

Influencing human behavior is the primary benefit of an information security awareness training program because it helps to reduce the human errors and vulnerabilities that can compromise the security of data and systems. An information security awareness training program is a process or a program that informs and empowers users to protect data and computing assets from security risks and cyberattacks. It includes educational offerings that cover regulatory requirements, compliance policies, and safe computing practices. An information security awareness training program helps to influence human behavior by raising awareness of the security threats and challenges, enhancing knowledge and skills of the security best practices and controls, and fostering a positive security culture and attitude among the users. By influencing human behavior, an information security awareness training program can improve the security posture and performance of the organization, as well as prevent or mitigate the impact of security incidents. Therefore, influencing human behavior is the correct answer.

The best first step is to evaluate and prioritize the risk to determine the appropriate treatment strategy before implementing mitigation.

“Once risks are identified, they should be evaluated and prioritized to determine the best response (mitigation, transfer, acceptance, or avoidance).”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Management, Section: Risk Treatment*

ISACA practice questions confirm the need for evaluation and prioritization before taking further action.

= According to the CISM Review Manual, one of the key success factors for an information security program is to maintain management support and commitment. This can be achieved by providing regular reports to management on the security status of the organization, the effectiveness of the security controls, and the alignment of the security program with the business objectives and strategy. By informing management about the security of business operations, the information security manager can demonstrate the value and benefits of the security program, and ensure that management is aware of the security risks and issues that need to be addressed. This technique can also help to build trust and confidence between the information security manager and the senior management, and foster a culture of security within the organization1

The other options are not as effective as informing management about the security of business operations. Implementing a comprehensive security awareness and training program is important, but it is mainly targeted at the end users and staff, not the senior management. Identifying the risks and consequences of failure to comply with standards can help to justify the need for security controls, but it can also create a negative impression of the security program as being too restrictive or punitive. Benchmarking the security programs of comparable organizations can provide some insights and best practices, but it may not reflect the specific needs and context of the organization, and it may not be relevant or applicable to the management’s expectations and priorities1

References = 1: CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2020, pp. 28-29…

 The most appropriate time to conduct a disaster recovery test would be after the business continuity plan (BCP) has been updated, as it ensures that the disaster recovery plan (DRP) is aligned with the current business requirements, objectives, and priorities. The BCP should be updated regularly to reflect any changes in the business environment, such as new threats, risks, processes, technologies, or regulations. The disaster recovery test should validate the effectiveness and efficiency of the DRP, as well as identify any gaps, issues, or improvement opportunities123. References =

1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 2114

2: CISM Practice Quiz, question 1042

3: Business Continuity Planning and Disaster Recovery Testing, section “Testing the Plan”

Recovery time objectives (RTOs) are the maximum acceptable time that an organization can be offline or unavailable after a disruption. RTOs are important to maintain integration among the incident response plan, business continuity plan (BCP), and disaster recovery plan (DRP) because they help align the recovery goals and strategies of each plan. By defining clear and realistic RTOs, an organization can ensure that its IT infrastructure and systems are restored as quickly as possible after a disaster, minimizing the impact on business operations and customer satisfaction.

References = CISM Manual, Chapter 6: Incident Response Planning, Section 6.2: Recovery Time Objectives (RTOs), page 971

1: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles

= Developing the test plan is the task that should be performed once a disaster recovery plan (DRP) has been developed. The test plan is a document that describes the objectives, scope, methods, and procedures for testing the DRP. The test plan should also define the roles and responsibilities of the test team, the test scenarios and criteria, the test schedule and resources, and the test reporting and evaluation. The purpose of testing the DRP is to verify its effectiveness, identify any gaps or weaknesses, and improve its reliability and usability. Testing the DRP also helps to increase the awareness and readiness of the staff and stakeholders involved in the disaster recovery process. Analyzing the business impact, defining response team roles, and identifying recovery time objectives (RTOs) are all tasks that should be performed before developing the DRP, not after. These tasks are part of the business continuity planning (BCP) process, which aims to identify the critical business functions and assets, assess the potential threats and impacts, and determine the recovery strategies and requirements. The DRP is a subset of the BCP that focuses on restoring the IT systems and services after a disaster. Therefore, the DRP should be based on the results of the BCP process, and tested after it has been developed. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 218 1; CISM Practice Quiz 2

Intelligent middleware enables dynamic rerouting and automated load balancing, which is crucial for high availability. This minimizes downtime and ensures continuity without manual intervention.

“Middleware solutions can provide automated failover capabilities, improving system resilience and availability.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Program Development and Management, Section: Availability and Resilience*

Manual failover and cold sites introduce delays, which are not suitable for e-business environments requiring near-zero downtime.

Criteria for activation are essential to ensure that the BCP is triggered appropriately in response to a disruption.

“The BCP should include clearly defined activation criteria to ensure that plans are invoked when necessary.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Business Continuity Planning*

ISACA’s practice questions confirm that criteria for activation are core to a BCP’s effectiveness.

 The best response for the organization to reduce risk from increasing cyberattacks is to revalidate and mitigate risks to an acceptable level. This means that the organization should review its current risk profile, identify any new or emerging threats, vulnerabilities, or impacts, and evaluate the effectiveness of its existing controls and countermeasures. Based on this analysis, the organization should implement appropriate risk treatment strategies, such as avoiding, transferring, accepting, or reducing the risks, to achieve its desired risk appetite and tolerance. The organization should also monitor and review the risk situation and the implemented controls on a regular basis, and update its risk management plan accordingly. This approach is consistent with the ISACA Risk IT Framework, which provides guidance on how to align IT risk management with business objectives and value12.

The other options are not the best responses because they are either too narrow or too reactive. Increasing budget and staffing levels for the incident response team may improve the organization’s ability to respond to and recover from cyberattacks, but it does not address the root causes or the prevention of the attacks. Implementing an intrusion detection system (IDS) may enhance the organization’s detection and analysis capabilities, but it does not guarantee the protection or mitigation of the attacks. Testing the business continuity plan (BCP) may verify the organization’s readiness and resilience to continue its critical operations in the event of a cyberattack, but it does not reduce the likelihood or the impact of the attack. References =

Risk IT Framework 1

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition | Print | English 2, Chapter 3: Information Risk Management, pages 97-98, 103-104, 107-108, 111-112.

= After a breach where the risk has been isolated and forensic processes have been performed, the next step should be to rebuild the server from the last verified backup. This will ensure that the server is restored to a known and secure state, and that any malicious code or data that may have been injected or compromised by the attacker is removed. Rebuilding the server from the original media may not be sufficient, as it may not include the latest patches or configurations that were applied before the breach. Placing the web server in quarantine or shutting it down may not be feasible or desirable, as it may disrupt the business operations or services that depend on the server. Rebuilding the server from the last verified backup is the best option to resume normal operations while maintaining security. References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 118: “Recovery is the process of restoring normal operations after an incident. Recovery activities may include rebuilding systems, restoring data, applying patches, changing passwords, and testing functionality.”

Data Breach Experts Share The Most Important Next Step You Should Take After A Data Breach in 2014 & 2015, snippet: “Restore from backup. If you have a backup of your system from before the breach, wipe your system clean and restore from backup. This will ensure that any backdoors or malware installed by the hackers are removed.”

The information security manager should first obtain legal guidance when there is a conflict between the organization’s information security policy and a local regulation, because this will help to understand the implications and consequences of the conflict, and to identify the possible options and solutions for resolving it. The information security manager should also consult with the relevant stakeholders, such as senior management, business owners, and information owners, to determine the best course of action that aligns with the organization’s objectives, risk appetite, and compliance obligations. Enforcing the local regulation or the organization’s information security policy without legal guidance may expose the organization to legal liabilities, security risks, or operational disruptions. Obtaining an independent assessment of the regulation may be helpful, but it is not the first step to take.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 691; A Guide to ISACA CISM Domains & Domain 1: Information Security Governance2