CISM Exam Dumps - Isaca Certification Questions and Answers

 Introducing security requirements during the initiation phase would BEST ensure that security is integrated during application development because it would allow the security objectives and controls to be defined and aligned with the business needs and risk appetite before any design or coding is done. This would also facilitate the security by design approach, which is the most effective method to enhance the security of applications and application development activities1. Introducing security requirements early would also enable the collaboration between security professionals and developers, the identification and specification of security architectures, and the integration and testing of security controls throughout the development life cycle2. Employing global security standards during development processes (A) would help to ensure the consistency and quality of security practices, but it would not necessarily ensure that security is integrated during application development. Providing training on secure development practices to programmers (B) would help to raise the awareness and skills of developers, but it would not ensure that security is integrated during application development. Performing application security testing during acceptance testing © would help to verify the security of the application before deployment, but it would not ensure that security is integrated during application development. It would also be too late to identify and remediate any security issues that could have been prevented or mitigated earlier in the development process. References = 1: Five Key Components of an Application Security Program - ISACA1; 2: CISM Domain – Information Security Program Development | Infosec2

The best way to ensure the organization’s security objectives are embedded in business operations is to implement an information security governance framework. An information security governance framework is a set of policies, procedures, standards, guidelines, roles, and responsibilities that define and direct how the organization manages and measures its information security activities. An information security governance framework helps to align the information security strategy with the business strategy and the organizational culture, and to ensure that the information security objectives are consistent with the business objectives and the stakeholder expectations. An information security governance framework also helps to establish the authority, accountability, and communication channels for the information security function, and to provide the necessary resources, tools, and controls to implement and monitor the information security program. By implementing an information security governance framework, the organization can embed the information security objectives in business operations, and ensure that the information security function supports and enables the business processes and functions, rather than hinders or restricts them.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Information Security Governance Framework, page 181; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 75, page 702.

A balanced scorecard enables information security governance by providing a framework for aligning security objectives with business goals and measuring performance against them. The other choices are not directly related to governance but may be supported by it.

A balanced scorecard is a strategic management tool that describes the cause-and-effect linkages between four high-level perspectives of strategy and execution: financial, customer, internal process, and learning and growth2. It helps organizations communicate and monitor their vision and strategy across different levels and functions2.

When a risk is determined to be below the organization’s risk appetite, the most appropriate course of action is to formally accept the risk. Risk acceptance is a valid and cost-effective strategy when the impact and likelihood are within acceptable limits, and the cost of mitigation outweighs the potential loss.

"Risk acceptance is an appropriate response when the level of residual risk is within the organization’s defined risk tolerance and appetite.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Response and Mitigation*

Avoidance, transfer, or mitigation may be overreactions that waste resources in this context.

Prevention of authorized access is the greatest threat posed by a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on a public-facing web server because it prevents legitimate users or customers from accessing the web services or resources, causing disruption, dissatisfaction, and potential loss of revenue or reputation. Execution of unauthorized commands is not a threat posed by a DDoS attack, but rather by a remote code execution (RCE) attack. Defacement of website content is not a threat posed by a DDoS attack, but rather by a web application attack. Unauthorized access to resources is not a threat posed by a DDoS attack, but rather by a brute force attack or an authentication bypass attack. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-6/the-value-of-penetration-testing https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-5/security-scanning-versus-penetration-testing

The primary reason for creating a business case when proposing an information security project is to establish the value of the project in relation to the business objectives and to justify the investment required. A business case should demonstrate how the project aligns with the organization’s strategy, goals, and mission, and how it supports the business processes and functions. A business case should also include the expected benefits, costs, risks, and alternatives of the project, and provide a clear rationale for choosing the preferred option.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook1, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Information Security Strategy, Subsection: Business Case Development, Page 33.

A business impact analysis (BIA) is a process that helps identify and evaluate the potential effects of disruptions or incidents on the organization’s mission, objectives, and operations. A BIA should be periodically executed to verify the effectiveness of the controls that are implemented to prevent, mitigate, or recover from such disruptions or incidents12.

According to the CISM Manual, a BIA should be performed at least annually for critical systems and processes, and more frequently for non-critical ones3. A BIA should also be updated whenever there are significant changes in the organization’s environment, such as new regulations, technologies, business models, or stakeholder expectations3. A BIA should not be used to validate vulnerabilities on environmental changes (A), analyze the importance of assets (B), or check compliance with regulations ©, as these are not the primary purposes of a BIA.

An effective information security awareness training program should aim to improve the knowledge, skills and behavior of the employees regarding information security. One of the ways to measure the effectiveness of such a program is to conduct phishing simulations, which are mock phishing attacks that test the employees’ ability to identify and report phishing emails. An increase in the identification rate during phishing simulations indicates that the employees have learned how to recognize and avoid phishing attempts, which is one of the common threats to information security. Therefore, this is the best indication of an effective information security awareness training program among the given options.

The other options are not as reliable or relevant as indicators of an effective information security awareness training program. An increase in the frequency of phishing tests does not necessarily mean that the employees are learning from them or that the tests are aligned with the learning objectives of the program. An increase in positive user feedback may reflect the satisfaction or engagement of the employees with the program, but it does not measure the actual learning outcomes or behavior changes. An increase in the speed of incident resolution may be influenced by other factors, such as the availability and efficiency of the incident response team, the severity and complexity of the incidents, or the tools and processes used for incident management. Moreover, the speed of incident resolution does not reflect the prevention or reduction of incidents, which is a more desirable goal of an information security awareness training program. References =

CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, ISACA, 2022, pp. 201-202, 207-208.

CISM Questions, Answers & Explanations Database, ISACA, 2022, QID 1001.

The primary reason to regularly update business continuity and disaster recovery documents is to ensure that the plans and procedures are aligned with the current business needs and objectives, and that they can effectively support the availability of business operations in the event of a disaster. Updating the documents also helps to enforce security policy requirements, maintain business asset inventories, and ensure audit and compliance requirements are met, but these are secondary benefits.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook1, Chapter 9: Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery, Section: Business Continuity Planning, Subsection: Business Continuity Plan Maintenance, Page 378.

 A post-incident review (PIR) is the process of evaluating the effectiveness of the incident response after the incident has been resolved. A PIR aims to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the response process, the root causes and impacts of the incident, the lessons learned and best practices, and the recommendations and action plans for improvement1. A PIR can help an organization enhance its incident response capabilities, reduce the likelihood and severity of future incidents, and increase its resilience and maturity2.

A PIR is the best process to support the evaluation of incident response effectiveness, because it provides a systematic and comprehensive way to assess the performance and outcomes of the response process, and to identify and implement the necessary changes and improvements. A PIR involves collecting and analyzing relevant data and feedback from various sources, such as incident logs, reports, evidence, metrics, surveys, interviews, and observations. A PIR also involves comparing the actual response with the expected or planned response, and measuring the achievement of the response objectives and the satisfaction of the stakeholders3. A PIR also involves documenting and communicating the findings, conclusions, and recommendations of the evaluation, and ensuring that they are followed up and implemented.

The other options are not as good as a PIR in supporting the evaluation of incident response effectiveness, because they are either more specific, limited, or dependent on a PIR. A root cause analysis (RCA) is a technique to identify the underlying factors or reasons that caused the incident, and to prevent or mitigate their recurrence. An RCA can help an organization understand the nature and origin of the incident, and to address the problem at its source, rather than its symptoms. However, an RCA is not sufficient to evaluate the effectiveness of the response process, because it does not cover other aspects, such as the response performance, outcomes, impacts, lessons, and best practices. An RCA is usually a part of a PIR, rather than a separate process. A chain of custody (CoC) is a process of maintaining and documenting the integrity and security of the evidence collected during the incident response. A CoC can help an organization ensure that the evidence is reliable, authentic, and admissible in legal or regulatory proceedings. However, a CoC is not a process to evaluate the effectiveness of the response process, but rather a requirement or a standard to follow during the response process. A CoC does not provide any feedback or analysis on the response performance, outcomes, impacts, lessons, or best practices. An incident logging is a process of recording and tracking the details and activities of the incident response. An incident logging can help an organization monitor and manage the response process, and to provide an audit trail and a source of information for the evaluation. However, an incident logging is not a process to evaluate the effectiveness of the response process, but rather an input or a tool for the evaluation. An incident logging does not provide any assessment or measurement on the response performance, outcomes, impacts, lessons, or best practices. References = 1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.5 2: Post-Incident Review: A Guide to Effective Incident Response 3: Post-Incident Review: A Guide to Effective Incident Response : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.5 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.5 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.4 : CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.3

The number of reported incidents has increased is the best evidence that a recently established information security program is effective because it indicates that the organization has improved its detection and reporting capabilities and has raised awareness among employees about security issues. Regular IT balanced scorecards are communicated is not a good evidence because it does not measure the actual performance or outcomes of the security program. Senior management has reported fewer junk emails is not a good evidence because it does not reflect the overall security posture or maturity of the organization. The number of tickets associated with IT incidents have stayed consistent is not a good evidence because it does not show any improvement or reduction in security incidents or risks. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2016/volume-6/how-to-measure-the-effectiveness-of-information-security-using-iso-27004 https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2014/volume-6/how-to-measure-the-effectiveness-of-your-information-security-management-system

Risk management is the most important factor for the effectiveness of an information security program, as it provides a systematic and consistent approach to identify, assess, treat, and monitor the information security risks that could affect the organization’s objectives. Risk management also helps to align the security program with the business strategy, prioritize the security initiatives and resources, and communicate the value of security to the stakeholders.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 3071; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 4, Knowledge Statement 4.1

 The information security manager should present a business case for additional controls to senior management, as this is the most effective way to communicate the risk and the need for mitigation. The information security manager should not instruct IT to deploy controls based on urgent business needs, as this may not align with the business objectives and may cause unnecessary costs and delays. The information security manager should not solicit bids for compensating control products, as this may not address the root cause of the risk and may not be the best solution. The information security manager should not recommend a different application, as this may not be feasible or desirable for the business. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 711; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2023, page 252

According to the web search results, a cloud access security broker (CASB) is a software solution that stands between the cloud service provider and the cloud service user to enforce security controls. One of the most important benefits of using a CASB when migrating to a cloud environment is enhanced data governance, as it helps to protect sensitive information from unauthorized access, sharing, or loss. A CASB can also provide data classification, encryption, data loss prevention (DLP), and other features that enable organizations to manage and secure their data in the cloud.

References = What Is a Cloud Access Security Broker (CASB)?, A beginner’s guide to cloud access security brokers