CISM Exam Dumps - Isaca Certification Questions and Answers

A reduction in annualized loss expectancy (ALE) demonstrates that implemented controls have effectively reduced the organization’s exposure to risk.

“ALE reduction is a key indicator of the cost-effectiveness of security investments and the improvement of the risk posture.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Management, Section: Cost-Benefit Analysis*

Performing frequent backups and storing them offline is the best way to reduce the impact of a successful ransomware attack, as this allows the organization to restore its data and systems without paying the ransom or losing valuable information. Purchasing or renewing cyber insurance policies may help cover some of the costs and losses associated with a ransomware attack, but it does not prevent or mitigate the attack itself. Including provisions to pay ransoms in the information security budget may encourage more attacks and does not guarantee the recovery of the data or the removal of the malware. Monitoring the network and providing alerts on intrusions may help detect and respond to a ransomware attack, but it does not reduce the impact of a successful attack that has already encrypted or exfiltrated the data. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 1661; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2023, page 312; CISM Exam Overview - Vinsys3

 The best way to test for the existence of backdoors in a mission-critical business application that was outsourced to a third-party developer is to perform security code reviews on the entire application. A backdoor is a hidden or undocumented feature or function in a software application that allows unauthorized or remote access, control, or manipulation of the application or the system it runs on. Backdoors can be intentionally or unintentionally introduced by the developers, or maliciously inserted by the attackers, and they can pose serious security risks and threats to the organization and its data. Security code reviews are the process of examining and analyzing the source code of a software application to identify and eliminate any security vulnerabilities, flaws, or weaknesses, such as backdoors, that may compromise the functionality, performance, or integrity of the application or the system. Security code reviews can be performed manually by the security experts, or automatically by the security tools, or both, and they can be done at different stages of the software development life cycle, such as design, coding, testing, or deployment. Security code reviews can help to detect and remove any backdoors in the application before they can be exploited by the attackers, and they can also help to improve the quality, reliability, and security of the application.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Information Security Program Development, page 1581; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 87, page 812; CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE, page 63.

The first step when a potential breach is discovered is to validate the breach. According to the CISM Review Manual, Domain 4, the information security manager must confirm the event to avoid unnecessary escalation or resource allocation. This validation ensures that the incident is real and justifies further response actions. Invoking the incident response plan or informing management comes after the breach is validated.

 The best indicator of the effectiveness of a recent information security awareness campaign delivered across the organization is the increase in the number of reported security incidents. This means that the employees have become more aware of the security threats and issues, and have learned how to recognize and report them to the appropriate authorities. Reporting security incidents is a vital part of the incident response process, as it helps to identify and contain the incidents, prevent further damage, and initiate the recovery actions. Reporting security incidents also helps to collect and analyze the incident data, which can be used to improve the security controls and policies, and to prevent or mitigate similar incidents in the future. An increase in the number of reported security incidents shows that the awareness campaign has successfully raised the level of security knowledge, attitude, and behavior among the employees, and has encouraged them to take an active role in protecting the organization’s information assets.

References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 1631

Measuring and Evaluating the Effectiveness of Security Awareness Improvement Methods2

Developing metrics to assess the effectiveness of cybersecurity awareness program3

How to build a successful information security awareness programme - BCS4

How to Increase Cybersecurity Awareness - ISACA5

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

Justifying investments in information security requires aligning proposals with business objectives to gain management approval.

A. Vulnerability scan results: These provide technical insights but are insufficient for high-level justification.

B. Competitor benchmark analysis: While useful, this is less relevant than demonstrating direct alignment with organizational needs.

C. Previous security budget: Historical data may provide context but does not justify future needs.

D. Business requirements: This is the BEST answer because aligning security investments with business objectives demonstrates the value and necessity of the program to stakeholders.

Risk ownership is the most important detail to capture in an organization's risk register. Risk ownership is the responsibility for managing a risk, including taking corrective action, and should be assigned to a specific individual or team. It is important to note that the risk owner is not necessarily the same as the risk acceptor, who is the individual or team who makes the final decision to accept a risk. Capturing risk ownership in the risk register is important to ensure that risks are actively managed and that the responsible parties are held accountable.

The development phase is the stage of the system development life cycle (SDLC) where the system requirements, design, architecture, and implementation are performed. The development phase is most challenging to implement security controls because it involves complex and dynamic processes that may not be well understood or documented. Security controls are essential for ensuring the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the system and its data, as well as for complying with regulatory and contractual obligations. However, security controls may also introduce additional costs, risks, and constraints to the development process, such as:

Increased complexity and overhead of testing, verification, validation, and maintenance

Reduced flexibility and agility of changing requirements or design

Increased dependency on external vendors or third parties for security services or products

Increased vulnerability to errors, defects, or vulnerabilities in the code or configuration

Increased difficulty in measuring and reporting on security performance or effectiveness

Therefore, implementing security controls in the development phase requires careful planning, coordination, communication, and collaboration among all stakeholders involved in the SDLC. It also requires a clear understanding of the security objectives, scope, criteria, standards, policies, procedures, roles, responsibilities, and resources for the system. Moreover, it requires a proactive approach to identifying and mitigating potential threats or risks that may affect the security of the system.

References = CISM Manual1, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development (ISPD), Section 3.1: System Development Life Cycle (SDLC)2

1: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles 2: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles

An organization is most likely to accept the risk of noncompliance with a new regulatory requirement when the cost of complying with the regulation exceeds the potential penalties. In such cases, from a cost-benefit perspective, the organization might find it more economical to absorb potential fines or penalties rather than implementing costly controls or processes to comply with the regulation.

“Risk acceptance occurs when the cost of mitigating or transferring the risk exceeds the benefit of the mitigation. This also applies to regulatory noncompliance if the penalties are less than the costs of compliance.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Management, Section: Risk Treatment Options*

ISACA’s practice questions highlight that risk acceptance is a legitimate treatment when costs outweigh potential penalties or impact.

Risk transfer involves shifting the impact or financial consequences of a risk to a third party. Purchasing cybersecurity insurance is the most common example, where the organization pays a premium to a provider who assumes certain financial responsibilities in the event of a security incident.

Other options listed do not transfer risk:

A. Using third-party applications may introduce new risks, not transfer existing ones.

C. Moving ownership within the organization is reassignment, not transfer.

D. Off-site backups are a form of risk mitigation, not transfer.

“Risk transfer shifts the financial consequences of a risk to another entity, typically through insurance or contractual arrangements.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 2: Risk Management, Section: Risk Treatment Options*

Example: “An organization may transfer the financial impact of a potential data breach through the purchase of cyber insurance.”

Comprehensive and Detailed Step-by-Step Explanation:

Risk-based vulnerability management prioritizes vulnerabilities based on the potential impact on critical assets.

A. The information available about the vulnerability: While important for assessing risk, it does not directly determine the priority.

B. The sensitivity of the asset and the data it contains: This is the BEST answer because prioritizing vulnerabilities based on the criticality of the affected assets ensures that high-impact threats are addressed first.

C. IT resource availability and constraints: These are logistical considerations but should not outweigh risk impact.

D. Whether patches have been developed and tested: Patches are important for remediation but do not determine prioritization.

 The organization’s vision and mission should be the PRIMARY basis for an information security strategy, as they define the purpose and direction of the organization and its information security needs. A comprehensive gap analysis is a tool to identify the current state and desired state of information security, and the actions needed to close the gap. Information security policies are the high-level statements of management’s intent and expectations for information security, and are derived from the information security strategy. Audit and regulatory requirements are external factors that influence the information security strategy, but are not the primary basis for it. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, pages 17-181; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 782

The primary basis for an information security strategy should be the organization's vision and mission. The organization's vision and mission should be the foundation for the security strategy, and should inform and guide the security policies, procedures, and practices that are implemented. The results of a comprehensive gap analysis, information security policies, and audit and regulatory requirements should all be taken into consideration when developing the security strategy, but should not be the primary basis.

= Reevaluation of risk is a vital aspect of the risk management process that helps organizations to identify and analyze new or evolving threats, vulnerabilities, and impacts on their assets, and implement the necessary controls to mitigate them. Reevaluation of risk is most critical when there is a change in the threat landscape, which refers to the external and internal factors that influence the likelihood and severity of potential attacks on the organization’s information assets. A change in the threat landscape may be caused by various factors, such as technological innovations, geopolitical events, cybercrime trends, regulatory changes, or organizational changes. A change in the threat landscape may introduce new risks or alter the existing risk profile of the organization, requiring a reassessment of the risk appetite, tolerance, and strategy. Reevaluation of risk helps the organization to adapt to the changing threat landscape and ensure that the information security program remains effective, efficient, and aligned with the business objectives.

References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 1131

CISM Domain 2: Information Risk Management (IRM) [2022 update]2

Reevaluation of Risk | CISM Exam Question Answer | ISACA3

Asset classification is the process of assigning a value to information assets based on their importance to the organization and the potential impact of their compromise, loss or damage1. Asset classification helps to determine the level of protection required for assets, which is proportional to their value and sensitivity2. Asset classification also facilitates risk assessment and management, as well as compliance with legal, regulatory and contractual requirements3. Asset classification does not primarily determine the insurance coverage, priority for replacement, or replacement cost of assets, as these factors depend on other criteria such as risk appetite, business impact, availability and market value4. References = 1: CISM - Information Asset Classification Flashcards | Quizlet 2: CISM Exam Content Outline | CISM Certification | ISACA 3: CIS Control 1: Inventory and Control of Enterprise Assets 4: CISSP versus the CISM Certification | ISC2

Process owners are the people who are responsible for the design, execution, and improvement of the business processes that support the organization’s objectives and operations. Process owners have the greatest importance in the development of an information security strategy, as they provide the input and feedback on the business requirements, expectations, and priorities that the information security strategy should address and support. Process owners also help to identify and assess the risks and impacts that the business processes face, and to define and implement the security controls and measures that can mitigate or reduce them. Process owners also facilitate the alignment and integration of the information security strategy with the business strategy, as well as the communication and collaboration among the various stakeholders and functions involved in the information security program. End users, security architects, and corporate auditors are all important stakeholders in the information security program, but they do not have the greatest importance in the development of an information security strategy. End users are the people who use the information systems and services that the information security program protects and enables. End users provide the input and feedback on the usability, functionality, and performance of the information systems and services, as well as the security awareness and behavior that they exhibit. Security architects are the people who design and implement the security architecture that supports the information security strategy. Security architects provide the input and feedback on the technical requirements, capabilities, and solutions that the information security strategy should leverage and optimize. Corporate auditors are the people who evaluate and verify the compliance and effectiveness of the information security program. Corporate auditors provide the input and feedback on the standards, regulations, and best practices that the information security strategy should follow and adhere to. Therefore, process owners have the greatest importance in the development of an information security strategy, as they provide the input and feedback on the business requirements, expectations, and priorities that the information security strategy should address and support. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 31 1; CISM Practice Quiz 2

The best way to ensure that frequently encountered incidents are reflected in the user security awareness training program is to include examples of help desk requests. Help desk requests are requests for assistance or support from users who encounter problems or issues related to information security, such as password resets, malware infections, phishing emails, unauthorized access, data loss, or system errors. Help desk requests can provide valuable insights into the types, frequencies, and impacts of the incidents that affect the users, as well as the users’ knowledge, skills, and behaviors regarding information security. By including examples of help desk requests in the user security awareness training program, the information security manager can achieve the following benefits12:

Increase the relevance and effectiveness of the training content: By using real-life scenarios and cases that the users have experienced or witnessed, the information security manager can make the training content more relevant, engaging, and applicable to the users’ needs and situations. The information security manager can also use the examples of help desk requests to illustrate the consequences and costs of the incidents, and to highlight the best practices and solutions to prevent or resolve them. This can help the users to understand the importance and value of information security, and to improve their knowledge, skills, and attitudes accordingly.

Identify and address the gaps and weaknesses in the training program: By analyzing the patterns and trends of the help desk requests, the information security manager can identify and address the gaps and weaknesses in the existing training program, such as outdated or inaccurate information, insufficient or ineffective coverage of topics, or lack of feedback or evaluation. The information security manager can also use the examples of help desk requests to measure and monitor the impact and outcomes of the training program, such as changes in the number, type, or severity of the incidents, or changes in the users’ satisfaction, performance, or behavior.

Enhance the communication and collaboration with the users and the help desk staff: By including examples of help desk requests in the user security awareness training program, the information security manager can enhance the communication and collaboration with the users and the help desk staff, who are the key stakeholders and partners in information security. The information security manager can use the examples of help desk requests to solicit feedback, suggestions, or questions from the users and the help desk staff, and to provide them with timely and relevant information, guidance, or support. The information security manager can also use the examples of help desk requests to recognize and appreciate the efforts and contributions of the users and the help desk staff in reporting, responding, or resolving the incidents, and to encourage and motivate them to continue their involvement and participation in information security.

The other options are not the best way to ensure that frequently encountered incidents are reflected in the user security awareness training program, as they are less reliable, relevant, or effective sources of information. Results of exit interviews are feedback from employees who are leaving the organization, and they may not reflect the current or future incidents that the remaining or new employees may face. Previous training sessions are records of the past training activities, and they may not capture the changes or updates in the information security environment, threats, or requirements. Responses to security questionnaires are answers to predefined questions or surveys, and they may not cover all the possible or emerging incidents that the users may encounter or experience12. References = Information Security Awareness Training: Best Practices - Infosec Resources, How to Create an Effective Security Awareness Training Program - Infosec Resources, Security Awareness Training: How to Build a Successful Program - ISACA, Security Awareness Training: How to Educate Your Employees - ISACA

The main reason to involve stakeholders from various business units is to gain their acceptance and buy-in for the information security policy. The CISM Review Manual underlines that policies are more effective and enforceable when stakeholders understand and agree with them, which also aids in smooth policy implementation across the organization.

 Increasing accountability is the primary reason for ensuring clearly defined roles and responsibilities are communicated to users who have been granted administrative privileges due to specific application requirements. Administrative privileges grant users the ability to perform actions that can affect the security, availability and integrity of the application or system, such as installing software, modifying configurations, accessing sensitive data or granting access to other users. Therefore, users who have administrative privileges must be aware of their roles and responsibilities and the consequences of their actions. Communicating clearly defined roles and responsibilities to these users helps to establish accountability by setting expectations, defining boundaries, assigning ownership and enabling monitoring and reporting. Accountability also helps to deter misuse or abuse of privileges, ensure compliance with policies and standards, and facilitate incident response and investigation.

Clearer segregation of duties is a benefit of ensuring clearly defined roles and responsibilities, but it is not the primary reason. Segregation of duties is a control that aims to prevent or detect conflicts of interest, errors, fraud or unauthorized activities by separating different functions or tasks among different users or groups. For example, a user who can create a purchase order should not be able to approve it. Segregation of duties helps to reduce the risk of unauthorized or inappropriate actions by requiring more than one person to complete a critical or sensitive process. However, segregation of duties alone does not ensure accountability, as users may still act in collusion or circumvent the control.

Increased user productivity is a possible outcome of ensuring clearly defined roles and responsibilities, but it is not the primary reason. User productivity refers to the efficiency and effectiveness of users in performing their tasks and achieving their goals. By communicating clearly defined roles and responsibilities, users may have a better understanding of their tasks, expectations and performance indicators, which may help them to work faster, smarter and better. However, user productivity is not directly related to the security risk of granting administrative privileges, and it may also depend on other factors, such as user skills, motivation, tools and resources.

Fewer security incidents is a desired result of ensuring clearly defined roles and responsibilities, but it is not the primary reason. Security incidents are events or situations that compromise the confidentiality, integrity or availability of information assets or systems. By communicating clearly defined roles and responsibilities, users may be more aware of the security implications of their actions and the potential threats and vulnerabilities they may face, which may help them to avoid or prevent security incidents. However, fewer security incidents is not a guarantee or a measure of accountability, as users may still cause or experience security incidents due to human error, negligence, malicious intent or external factors. References =

CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, page 144

Effective User Access Reviews - ISACA1

CISM ITEM DEVELOPMENT GUIDE - ISACA2