CISM Exam Dumps - Isaca Certification Questions and Answers

The correct answer is A because the risk owner is accountable for managing risk associated with a business process, asset, or activity. Since risks arise in a business context, the risk owner must ensure that selected controls align with business objectives, risk appetite, and applicable regulatory requirements. Control owners are responsible for implementing, operating, and maintaining specific controls, but they do not own the business risk itself. Compliance managers help interpret and monitor compliance requirements, but they are not usually accountable for business risk treatment decisions. Control assessors evaluate whether controls are designed and operating effectively, but they do not own the risk or determine business alignment. CISM places strong emphasis on business ownership of information risk. Information security managers support and advise, but accountability for risk remains with the business or risk owner. Therefore, the risk owner is responsible for ensuring that controls appropriately support business objectives and regulatory obligations.

Upon learning a control is ineffective, the first action should be to assess the state of the control to verify the issue, determine its root cause, and assess the risk exposure. The CISM Review Manual emphasizes that assessment comes before taking further steps like replacement or escalation, as it informs appropriate, risk-based action.

The best reason for delaying a critical security patch is technology interdependencies . CISM recognizes that patching must be risk-based, but also controlled to avoid creating operational outages or failures in dependent systems. Critical patches should generally be applied promptly; however, if a patch may disrupt interconnected applications, infrastructure, or business-critical services, the organization may need to test, coordinate, and implement temporary compensating controls before deployment. Conflicts with the software development life cycle are not a strong reason to delay a critical security patch because emergency change processes should exist. Lack of vulnerability management is a program weakness, not a valid justification. Resource limitations may explain a delay but do not represent a sound security rationale for accepting increased exposure. Technology interdependencies can create unacceptable availability or integrity impacts if not managed carefully. Therefore, delaying the patch may be justified only to ensure safe implementation while managing the interim risk through approved risk treatment and compensating controls.

According to the CISM Review Manual (Digital Version), Chapter 3, Section 3.2.2, change management is the process of identifying, assessing, approving, implementing, and monitoring changes to information systems and information security controls1. Change management is essential for ensuring that changes are aligned with the organization’s business strategy and objectives, as well as complying with applicable laws and regulations1.

The CISM Review Manual (Digital Version) also states that change management should be performed in conjunction with other processes, such as configuration management, access control management, and risk management1. Configuration management is the process of identifying, documenting, controlling, and verifying the configuration items (CIs) of an information system1. Access control management is the process of granting or denying access to information systems and information assets based on predefined policies and procedures1. Risk management is the process of identifying, analyzing, evaluating, treating, monitoring, and communicating risks to information systems and information assets1.

The CISM Exam Content Outline also covers the topic of change management in Domain 3 — Information Security Program Development and Management (27% exam weight)2. The subtopics include:

3.2.2 Change Management

3.2.3 Change Control

3.2.4 Change Implementation

3.2.5 Change Monitoring

I hope this answer helps you prepare for your CISM exam. Good luck! ????

The disk hash value is a unique identifier that is calculated from the binary data of the disk. It is used to verify that the disk image is an exact copy of the original disk and that no changes have occurred during the acquisition or analysis process. The disk hash value is stored externally, such as on a CD-ROM or a USB drive, to prevent tampering or corruption. The disk hash value can also be used as evidence in court to prove the authenticity and reliability of the digital evidence123 References = 1: CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, ISACA, 2017, page 2532: Guide to Computer Forensics and Investigations Fourth Edition, page 4-103: Forensic disk acquisition over the network, Andrea Fortuna, 2018.

The main purpose of creating and storing an external disk hash value when performing forensic data acquisition from a hard disk is to validate the integrity of the data during the analysis. This is done by comparing the original hash value of the disk to the hash value created during the acquisition process, which can be used to ensure that the data has not been tampered with or corrupted in any way. Additionally, by creating a hash value of the disk, it can be used to quickly verify the integrity of any data that is accessed from the disk in the future.

Performing frequent backups and storing them offline is the best way to reduce the impact of a successful ransomware attack, as this allows the organization to restore its data and systems without paying the ransom or losing valuable information. Purchasing or renewing cyber insurance policies may help cover some of the costs and losses associated with a ransomware attack, but it does not prevent or mitigate the attack itself. Including provisions to pay ransoms in the information security budget may encourage more attacks and does not guarantee the recovery of the data or the removal of the malware. Monitoring the network and providing alerts on intrusions may help detect and respond to a ransomware attack, but it does not reduce the impact of a successful attack that has already encrypted or exfiltrated the data. References = CISM Review Manual 2023, page 1661; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 2023, page 312; CISM Exam Overview - Vinsys3

Phishing awareness training is the best way to mitigate the risk of employees clicking on malicious links in emails, as it educates them on how to recognize and avoid phishing attempts. (From CISM Review Manual 15th Edition)

The correct answer is A because security must be defined as a requirement early in system development projects. Security requirements translate business, regulatory, privacy, risk, and control expectations into specific project deliverables. When requirements are defined early, security can be built into architecture, design, development, testing, and deployment. If requirements are not defined at the beginning, security may be added later as a costly or incomplete afterthought. Assigning resources based on business impact is useful, but resource planning should follow a clear understanding of the required security outcomes. Reviewing the security policy may provide guidance, but it does not by itself integrate security into the project. Embedding a security representative can support integration, but the representative still needs defined requirements to guide the project team. CISM program management emphasizes integrating information security into life cycle processes and business initiatives as early as possible. Therefore, defining security requirements is the first and most important step to ensure security is built into system development projects.

The effective execution of an incident response plan depends largely on the competence and readiness of the response team, who are responsible for carrying out the tasks and activities defined in the plan. Therefore, the best way to facilitate the effective execution of an incident response plan is to ensure that the response team is trained on the plan, and that they are familiar with their roles, responsibilities, procedures, and tools. Training the response team on the plan will also help to improve their confidence, communication, coordination, and collaboration during an incident response. The other options are not the best ways to facilitate the effective execution of an incident response plan, although they may be important factors for developing or improving the plan. The plan should be based on risk assessment results and industry best practice, but these do not guarantee that the plan will be executed effectively. The incident response plan should align with the IT disaster recovery plan, but this does not ensure that the response team is prepared and capable of executing the plan. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, page 1031

The best way to facilitate the effective execution of an incident response plan is to ensure that the response team is trained on the plan. An incident response plan is a set of instructions that defines the roles, responsibilities, procedures, and tools for detecting, responding to, and recovering from security incidents. An incident response team is a group of individuals that are assigned to perform specific tasks and activities during an incident response process. The response team may include security analysts, IT staff, legal counsel, public relations, and other stakeholders. To execute an incident response plan effectively, the response team needs to be trained on the plan, which means they need to be familiar with the following aspects of the plan: The scope and objectives of the plan The roles and responsibilities of each team member The communication and escalation protocols The incident classification and prioritization criteria The incident response procedures and tools The incident documentation and reporting requirements The incident review and improvement processes By training the response team on the plan, the organization can ensure that the team members are prepared and confident to handle any security incidents that may occur, and that they can perform their tasks efficiently and consistently. The other options are not the best way to facilitate the effective execution of an incident response plan, although they may be some steps or outcomes of the process. The plan being based on risk assessment results is a desirable practice, as it ensures that the plan is aligned with the organization’s risk profile and addresses the most relevant and likely threats and vulnerabilities. However, it does not guarantee that the plan will be executed effectively unless the response team is trained on the plan. The plan being based on industry best practice is a desirable practice, as it ensures that the plan follows established standards and guidelines for incident response. However, it does not guarantee that the plan will be executed effectively unless the response team is trained on the plan. The incident response plan aligning with the IT disaster recovery plan (DRP) is a desirable practice, as it ensures that the plans are consistent and coordinated in terms of objectives, scope, roles, procedures, and tools. However, it does not guarantee that the plan will be executed effectively unless the response team is trained on the plan

A BCP is a document that outlines the processes and procedures to maintain or resume critical business functions and minimize the impact of a disruption on the organization’s objectives, customers, and stakeholders. A BCP should be reviewed and updated regularly to reflect the changes in the organization’s environment, risks, resources, and requirements. An outdated BCP may result in less efficient recovery if an actual incident occurs, as it may not account for the current situation, dependencies, priorities, or recovery strategies. This may lead to increased downtime, losses, or damages for the organization.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 3101; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 4, Knowledge Statement 4.82; CISM 2020: Business Continuity3; Part Two: Business Continuity and Disaster Recovery Plans

A walk-through of the disaster recovery plan (DRP) is a method of testing the plan by simulating a disaster scenario and having the participants review their roles and responsibilities, as well as the procedures and resources required to execute the plan. A walk-through has the greatest positive impact on the ability to execute the DRP, as it helps to identify and resolve any gaps, errors, or inconsistencies in the plan, as well as to enhance the awareness and readiness of the stakeholders involved in the recovery process. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 5, Section 5.3.2.21

= According to the CISM Review Manual, availability is the degree to which information and systems are accessible to authorized users in a timely and reliable manner1. Availability ensures that services are delivered to the users as expected and agreed upon. Nonrepudiation is the ability to prove the occurrence of a claimed event or action and its originating entities1. It ensures that the parties involved in a transaction cannot deny their involvement. Authenticity is the quality or state of being genuine or original, rather than a reproduction or fabrication1. It ensures that the identity of a subject or resource is valid. Recovery time objective (RTO) is the maximum acceptable period of time that can elapse before the unavailability of a business function severely impacts the organization1. It is a metric used to measure the recovery capability of a system or service, not a factor that ensures timely and reliable access to services. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 2, Information Risk Management, pages 66-67.

An incident response plan is a set of procedures and guidelines that define the roles and responsibilities of the incident response team, the steps to follow in the event of an incident, and the communication and escalation protocols to ensure timely and effective resolution of incidents. One of the essential components of an incident response plan is the criteria for escalation, which specify the conditions and thresholds that trigger the escalation of an incident to a higher level of authority or a different function within the organization. The criteria for escalation may depend on factors such as the severity, impact, duration, scope, and complexity of the incident, as well as the availability and capability of the incident response team. The criteria for escalation help to ensure that incidents are handled by the appropriate personnel, that management is kept informed and involved, and that the necessary resources and support are provided to resolve the incident. References =  https://blog.exigence.io/a-practical-approach-to-incident-management-escalation https://www.uc.edu/content/dam/uc/infosec/docs/Guidelines/Information_Security_Incident_Response_Escalation_Guideline.pdf

The first thing that should be done when a SIEM flags a potential event is A. Validate the event is not a false positive. This is because a false positive is an event that is incorrectly identified as malicious or suspicious by the SIEM, when in fact it is benign or normal. False positives can waste the time and resources of the security team, and reduce the trust and confidence in the SIEM system. Therefore, it is important to verify the accuracy and validity of the event before initiating any further actions, such as incident response, escalation, or compensating controls. Validation can be done by analyzing the event data, comparing it with the baseline or normal behavior, and checking for any anomalies or indicators of compromise.

A false positive is an event that is incorrectly identified as malicious or suspicious by the SIEM, when in fact it is benign or normal. Validation can be done by analyzing the event data, comparing it with the baseline or normal behavior, and checking for any anomalies or indicators of compromise. (From CISM Manual or related resources)

References = CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4, Section 4.2.1, page 2091; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual 9th Edition, Question 72, page 19