CISM Exam Dumps - Isaca Certification Questions and Answers

 When developing a categorization method for security incidents, the categories must have agreed-upon definitions. This means that the categories should be clear, consistent, and understandable for all the parties involved in the incident response process, such as the incident handlers, the stakeholders, the management, and the external authorities. Having agreed-upon definitions for the categories can help to ensure that the incidents are classified and reported accurately, that the appropriate actions and resources are allocated, and that the communication and coordination are effective. Aligning with industry standards, creating by the incident handler, and aligning with reporting requirements are not mandatory for developing a categorization method for security incidents, although they may be desirable or beneficial depending on the context and objectives of the organization. Aligning with industry standards can help to adopt best practices and benchmarks for incident response, but it may not be feasible or suitable for all types of incidents or organizations. Creating by the incident handler can allow for flexibility and customization of the categories, but it may also introduce inconsistency and ambiguity if the definitions are not shared or agreed upon by others. Aligning with reporting requirements can help to comply with legal or contractual obligations, but it may not cover all the aspects or dimensions of the incidents that need to be categorized. References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, pages 200-2011; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, page 822

When developing a categorization method for security incidents, the categories MUST have agreed-upon definitions. This is because having clear and consistent definitions for each category of incidents will help to ensure a common understanding and communication among the incident response team and other stakeholders. It will also facilitate the accurate and timely identification, classification, reporting and analysis of incidents. Having agreed-upon definitions will also help to avoid confusion, ambiguity and inconsistency in the incident management process

The eradication phase of an incident response plan is where the root cause of the incident is determined and eliminated. This phase involves identifying and removing all traces of the malicious activity from the affected systems and restoring them to a secure state.

References = NIST SP 800-61 Revision 2, CISM Review Manual 15th Edition

 An information security program is best positioned for success when it is closely aligned with the information security strategy, which defines the organization’s vision, mission, goals, objectives, and risk appetite for information security. The information security strategy provides the direction and guidance for developing and implementing the information security program, ensuring that it supports the organization’s business processes and objectives. The information security strategy also helps to establish the scope, boundaries, roles, responsibilities, and resources for the information security program.

References = CISM Manual, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development (ISPD), Section 3.1: Information Security Strategy1

1: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles

A key consideration in the use of quantitative risk analysis is that it assigns numeric values to exposures of information assets, such as the probability of occurrence, the frequency of occurrence, the impact of occurrence, and the monetary value of the assets. These numeric values help to measure and compare the risks in a more objective and consistent way, and to support the decision-making process based on cost-benefit analysis. Quantitative risk analysis also requires reliable and accurate data sources, and it may involve the use of statistical tools and techniques.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition eBook1, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management, Section: Risk Analysis, Subsection: Quantitative Risk Analysis, Page 84.

Encryption tools and personal data are the most often associated with legal issues in the context of transborder flow of technology-related items because they involve the protection of privacy and security of individuals and organizations across different jurisdictions, and may be subject to different laws and regulations that govern their access, use, or transfer. Website transactions and taxation are not very often associated with legal issues in this context because they involve the exchange of goods and services and the collection of taxes across different jurisdictions, which may not be directly related to technology transfer or data flow. Software patches and corporate data are not very often associated with legal issues in this context because they involve the maintenance and improvement of software functionality and the management and sharing of business information, which may not be directly related to technology transfer or data flow. Lack of competition and free trade are not very often associated with legal issues in this context because they involve the market structure and trade policies of different jurisdictions, which may not be directly related to technology transfer or data flow. References: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/science-and-technology/oecd-declaration-on-transborder-data-flows_230240624407 https://legalinstruments.oecd.org/public/doc/108/108.en.pdf

Information security due diligence is the process of assessing the current state of information security in an organization, identifying any gaps, risks, or vulnerabilities, and estimating the costs and efforts required to remediate them. Performing information security due diligence prior to making the purchase is important to determine the security exposures that may affect the value, reputation, or liability of the organization, as well as the feasibility and compatibility of integrating the security systems and processes of the two organizations.

References = CISM Review Manual 2022, page 361; CISM Exam Content Outline, Domain 1, Task 1.22; Information Security Due Diligence Questionnair

 The most important reason to conduct interviews as part of the business impact analysis (BIA) process is to obtain input from as many relevant stakeholders as possible. A BIA is a process of identifying and analyzing the potential effects of disruptive events on the organization’s critical business functions, processes, and resources. A BIA helps to determine the recovery priorities, objectives, and strategies for the organization’s continuity planning. Interviews are one of the methods to collect data and information for the BIA, and they involve direct and interactive communication with the stakeholders who are involved in or affected by the business functions, processes, and resources. By conducting interviews, the information security manager can obtain input from as many relevant stakeholders as possible, such as business owners, managers, users, customers, suppliers, regulators, and partners. This can help to ensure that the BIA covers the full scope and complexity of the organization’s business activities, and that the BIA reflects the accurate, current, and comprehensive views and expectations of the stakeholders. Interviews can also help to validate, clarify, and supplement the data and information obtained from other sources, such as surveys, questionnaires, documents, or systems. Interviews can also help to build rapport, trust, and collaboration among the stakeholders, and to increase their awareness, involvement, and commitment to the information security and continuity planning.

References = CISM Review Manual, 16th Edition, Chapter 3: Information Security Program Development and Management, Section: Business Impact Analysis (BIA), pages 178-1801; CISM Review Questions, Answers & Explanations Manual, 10th Edition, Question 65, page 602.

Including the impact of the risk as part of regular metrics is the best way for the information security manager to help senior management understand the related risk of having many user workstations with unpatched versions of software because it quantifies and communicates the potential consequences and likelihood of such a risk in terms of business objectives and performance indicators. Recommending the security steering committee conduct a review is not a good way because it does not provide any specific information or analysis about the risk or its impact. Updating the risk assessment at regular intervals is not a good way because it does not ensure that senior management is aware or informed about the risk or its impact. Sending regular notifications directly to senior managers is not a good way because it may be perceived as intrusive or annoying, and may not convey the severity or urgency of the risk or its impact. References: https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2015/volume-6/measuring-the-value-of-information-security-investments https://www.isaca.org/resources/isaca-journal/issues/2017/volume-3/how-to-measure-the-effectiveness-of-your-information-security-management-system

Compartmentalization is the best defense-in-depth implementation for protecting high value assets or for handling environments that have trust concerns because it is a strategy that divides the network or system into smaller segments or compartments, each with its own security policies, controls, and access rules. Compartmentalization helps to isolate and protect the most sensitive or critical data and functions from unauthorized or malicious access, as well as to limit the damage or impact of a breach or compromise. Compartmentalization also helps to enforce the principle of least privilege, which grants users or processes only the minimum access rights they need to perform their tasks. Therefore, compartmentalization is the correct answer.

Compliance status reporting is the best element of a service contract that would enable an organization to monitor the information security risk associated with a cloud service provider, as it provides the organization with regular and timely information on the cloud service provider’s compliance with the agreed-upon security requirements, standards, and regulations. Compliance status reporting also helps the organization to identify any gaps or issues that need to be addressed or resolved, and to verify the effectiveness of the cloud service provider’s controls. (From CISM Review Manual 15th Edition)

Eradication is the phase of incident response where the incident team removes the threat from the affected systems and restores them to a secure state. If this phase is not successful, the malware may persist or reappear on the systems, causing further damage or compromise. Therefore, eradication is the correct answer.

AI-driven tools enable real-time analysis, anomaly detection, and automated response, drastically reducing the time to identify and respond to threats. This capability is particularly effective against advanced persistent threats (APTs) and zero-day exploits.

“AI tools enhance security operations by enabling rapid threat detection and incident response, often before traditional tools can react.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 4: Security Operations and Threat Intelligence*

Other benefits (e.g., prioritization or patching) are secondary compared to the speed and precision of AI-based threat response.

When outsourcing to a cloud provider, regulatory compliance is paramount—especially with sensitive or proprietary applications. Non-compliance could result in legal penalties, fines, or reputational damage.

While RPOs, SLAs, and contract clauses are critical components of vendor risk management, ensuring adherence to relevant laws and industry regulations (such as GDPR, HIPAA, PCI DSS) is the first priority in cloud migration decisions.

“Prior to selecting a cloud provider, legal, regulatory, and contractual requirements must be reviewed to ensure alignment.”

— CISM Review Manual 15th Edition, Chapter 1: Information Security Governance, Section: Compliance Considerations in Cloud Computing*

= According to the CISM Manual1, risk is defined as the combination of the probability of an event and its consequence. Therefore, determining the risk for a particular threat/vulnerability pair before controls are applied can be expressed as a function of the likelihood and impact, should a threat exploit a vulnerability. Likelihood is the probability or frequency of a threat occurring, while impact is the magnitude or severity of the harm or loss that would result from a threat exploiting a vulnerability. The higher the likelihood and impact, the higher the risk. The lower the likelihood and impact, the lower the risk.

The other options are not correct because they do not capture the full expression of risk. Option B only considers the impact, but not the likelihood, of a threat exploiting a vulnerability. Option C confuses the risk with the risk response, which is the action taken to reduce or mitigate the risk. Option D only considers the likelihood, but not the impact, of a threat attempting to exploit a vulnerability.

References = CISM Manual1, Chapter 2: Information Risk Management (IRM), Section 2.1: Risk Concepts2

1: https://store.isaca.org/s/store#/store/browse/cat/a2D4w00000Ac6NNEAZ/tiles 2: 2