PMI-ACP Exam Dumps - PMI Agile Questions and Answers

The correct answer is A — Capture risks and make them visible, and use a burndown chart to focus on reducing risks early in the project.

Technical uncertainty is a key area of risk in Agile projects. These risks should be clearly communicated, visualized, and prioritized early in the project to allow timely mitigation. Agile teams are empowered to make decisions and highlight blockers rather than delay work or seek hierarchical intervention.

PMI Agile Practice Guide states:

“Agile teams actively manage risk through transparency and continuous feedback. Risks should be made visible on information radiators and addressed early in the project to prevent impact on value delivery.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 7.3 – Risk Management)

Mike Griffiths adds:

“Teams facing uncertainty must surface risks openly and early. Using charts such as risk burndown and dashboards helps keep focus on managing these risks iteratively.”

(PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 6 – Problem Detection and Resolution)

Incorrect options:

B contradicts the time-boxing principle of sprints.

C raises awareness but lacks proactive risk mitigation.

D introduces a command-and-control dynamic, which is not agile.

Answer: A

—

The storming phase (from Tuckman’s model: Forming–Storming–Norming–Performing) is marked by conflict and role negotiation. The agile coach or Scrum Master plays a critical role in guiding teams through this phase with structured facilitation and conflict-resolution techniques.

According to the PMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 4.3.2: Team Development Stages) and Mike Griffiths’ PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 3: Team Performance), the agile coach must provide support, guidance, and tools to help the team evolve toward self-organization and maturity.

Option B is correct: effective facilitation helps the team progress toward high performance.

Option A promotes dysfunction.

Option C risks escalating unresolved conflict.

Option D is overly individual-focused and not team-centric.

The correct answer is A – Prioritize the stakeholder feedback, considering the impact on strategic objectives and current workload, and discuss these priorities with the team in the next sprint planning meeting to collaboratively decide on the next steps.

Agile promotes adaptive planning and continuous stakeholder engagement. While feedback is highly valuable, especially from a sprint review, changes to the product backlog must be carefully prioritized and collaboratively discussed with the team. The product owner’s responsibility is to maintain and refine the backlog, ensuring alignment with stakeholder needs while also preserving team focus and avoiding unnecessary disruption during an ongoing sprint.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Product backlog refinement is an ongoing process in which the product owner and the team collaborate on the details of backlog items. This includes analyzing, estimating, and prioritizing items to reflect the latest feedback and business needs.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.2 – Product Backlog Refinement)

“Agile teams embrace change, especially when it delivers value. However, they also maintain sustainable pace and focus by avoiding mid-sprint scope changes unless absolutely necessary. Backlog items are reviewed and reprioritized before the next sprint begins.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 3.4 – Value-Driven Delivery)

From Mike Griffiths’ PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book:

“While agile encourages responding to change, disrupting sprint commitments can erode team trust and productivity. Sprint planning is the correct forum to reprioritize work based on new stakeholder insights.”

(Mike Griffiths, Chapter 5 – Adaptive Planning)

Why the other options are incorrect:

B introduces mid-sprint disruption and disregards agile best practices for maintaining sprint integrity and team focus.

C eliminates team collaboration and risks breakdowns in communication, violating agile’s emphasis on transparency and teamwork.

D disregards valuable feedback and delays addressing important stakeholder needs, which could compromise customer satisfaction and strategic alignment.

Answer: A

──────

The correct answer is A – Inform the stakeholder that all updates are provided in the sprint review sessions and encourage them to attend.

The Sprint Review is designed to provide transparency to stakeholders, demonstrate completed work, and gather feedback. Stakeholders should be encouraged to attend these events to stay updated and engaged.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Sprint reviews are intended to engage stakeholders in reviewing completed work and discussing priorities. This event ensures transparency and encourages stakeholder collaboration.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.5 – Stakeholder Engagement)

Mike Griffiths adds:

“Agile teams encourage stakeholder participation in regularly scheduled review meetings to maintain alignment and foster transparency.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 3 – Stakeholder Engagement)

Other options:

B adds non-Agile overhead and undermines Agile transparency mechanisms.

C and D are dismissive and uncollaborative, potentially damaging relationships.

Answer: A

══════════════════════════════════════════════════

Agile promotes cross-team collaboration and shared understanding of goals, especially when dependencies exist. The PMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 4.3.1: Team Collaboration and Alignment) recommends using vision alignment and shared objectives to reduce silos and improve coordination. A vision-sharing session ensures that all teams understand the business context and mutual interdependencies, helping build accountability and improve collaboration.

Option B is correct: shared vision fosters alignment and commitment.

Option A is punitive and against agile values of collaboration.

Option C disrupts team stability and should not be a first step.

Option D addresses the symptom (delivery delay) but not the root cause (lack of shared vision/accountability).

Kanban is continuous and can lead to burnout or low morale due to lack of visible milestones. The PMI Agile Practice Guide (Section 5.7: Flow-based Agile) and Mike Griffiths’ PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book (Chapter 3: Team Performance) suggest that recognizing and celebrating milestones or delivery points is essential to maintain motivation, especially in long-running Kanban teams.

Option A is correct: celebrating completed work gives the team a sense of closure and achievement, improving engagement.

Option B might help temporarily but doesn’t address the root motivational issue.

Option C adds pressure and is counterproductive.

Option D may improve flow but doesn ' t directly address the lack of visible progress recognition.

The correct answer is D — Ask the agile practitioner to facilitate a story-writing workshop.

When stakeholders have conflicting inputs, a collaborative approach such as a story-writing workshop enables the team to converge on a shared understanding. The agile practitioner (Scrum Master or Agile Coach) plays a key role in facilitating these sessions to ensure productive dialogue and alignment.

PMI Agile Practice Guide explains:

“Facilitated workshops, including story-writing workshops, help surface differences in stakeholder needs and create alignment through structured collaboration. Agile practitioners often lead these sessions to ensure neutrality and focus.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 5.2 — Backlog Refinement)

Mike Griffiths’ book adds:

“Agile practitioners support product owners in building and refining the backlog, especially when multiple viewpoints or conflicts exist. Facilitated workshops ensure transparency and a collaborative environment.”

(PMI-ACP Exam Prep, Chapter 3 – Value-Driven Delivery)

Incorrect options:

A is incorrect because the practitioner’s role is to facilitate, not write the stories.

B is a good idea, but the product owner should not delegate facilitation to the team.

C may assist with clarification but won’t help resolve conflict or prioritize across stakeholders.

Answer: D

—

If the team members are already communicating regularly with each other and the customer, the daily coordination meetings may not be necessary. The project manager should adapt to the team ' s needs by reducing the frequency of these meetings, allowing the team to focus more on delivering work. This approach supports Agile principles of minimizing waste and encouraging efficient communication, ensuring that meetings are only held when they add clear value. The team can use alternative methods (e.g., a digital board or asynchronous communication) to stay aligned.

The correct answer is C – Work with the team to create a solution for disseminating team knowledge throughout the company.

Agile values shared learning and continuous improvement. A lack of accessible organizational knowledge is a systemic issue. The agile practitioner should help the team implement lightweight, repeatable knowledge-sharing practices—such as wikis, communities of practice, or internal retrospectives.

From the PMI Agile Practice Guide:

“Organizational learning is an essential part of agile culture. Sharing information across teams enables continuous improvement and avoids repeated mistakes.”

(PMI Agile Practice Guide, Section 7.1 – Organizational Learning)

Mike Griffiths adds:

“Coaching agile teams includes promoting knowledge sharing mechanisms across the organization. Practices like open reviews, documentation wikis, or retrospective reports can help teams learn from each other.”

(Mike Griffiths, PMI-ACP Exam Prep Book, Chapter 7 – Continuous Improvement)

Why the other options are incorrect:

A suggests reporting but may become overhead without solving the core issue.

B avoids organizational improvement by isolating the team.

D brings in external help when the issue can be resolved internally.

Answer: C

══════════════════════════════════════════════════

In an agile environment, conflicts are seen as opportunities for collaboration and finding the best solution. The project manager should help the team by restating the positions of the team members to clarify their viewpoints and identify common ground. This approach encourages active listening, fosters understanding, and helps the team focus on shared goals rather than individual positions. Once the commonalities are identified, the team can collaboratively find a resolution that benefits the project, leveraging diverse perspectives to improve the outcome.